Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91071
| From | Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Camelot a good tool for me OT beauty of Tk |
| References | <87zj4xoxfd.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.216.1432299860.17265.python-list@python.org><mjo1bm$ain$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2015-05-22 22:13 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.240.1432325616.17265.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
In a message of Fri, 22 May 2015 21:52:27 +0200, Christian Gollwitzer writes: >Am 22.05.15 um 15:03 schrieb Laura Creighton: >> I don't know anything about Camelot. Tkinter produces widgets that are >> in no way as pretty graphically as is expected nowadays -- or indeed for >> at least 15 years. If this matters to you -- or if you are building for >> customers if it matters to them, then Tkinter is not a good choice. > >Tkinter doesn't need to be ugly. At least if you are on Windows or OSX, >you can make near-native looking programs, if you stick to the simple >rule to use ttk everywhere and never try to override background colors >etc. Another important rule is that icons play an important role. A >decent icon set makes a big difference. I didn't know that. Thank you. >Would you spot that it is not a "native" Windows app? It's raw Tcl/Tk >rather than Tkinter, but there is no specific reason why it couldn't be >done in Python/Tkinter. On Linux, yes, the default themes are quite >ugly. There are some workarounds, like loading the bitmap plastik theme, >but this is substantially more (configuration) work. And, of course, I live in the linux world. I didn't know about the bitmap plastik theme, either, thank you again. > > Christian Laura
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Camelot a good tool for me Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-22 09:59 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2015-05-22 12:38 +0000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-05-22 23:02 +1000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-22 15:11 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2015-05-22 14:29 +0100
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 15:57 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-05-22 19:24 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-23 03:37 +1000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 19:56 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-05-22 21:12 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-23 18:59 +1000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-05-24 15:15 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 15:03 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me OT beauty of Tk Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-05-22 21:52 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me OT beauty of Tk Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 22:13 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-22 15:24 +0100
Re: Camelot a good tool for me felix <felix@epepm.cupet.cu> - 2015-05-22 10:50 -0400
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-05-24 07:05 -0500
csiph-web