Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91068
| From | Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Camelot a good tool for me OT beauty of Tk |
| Date | 2015-05-22 21:52 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mjo1bm$ain$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <87zj4xoxfd.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.216.1432299860.17265.python-list@python.org> |
Am 22.05.15 um 15:03 schrieb Laura Creighton: > I don't know anything about Camelot. Tkinter produces widgets that are > in no way as pretty graphically as is expected nowadays -- or indeed for > at least 15 years. If this matters to you -- or if you are building for > customers if it matters to them, then Tkinter is not a good choice. Tkinter doesn't need to be ugly. At least if you are on Windows or OSX, you can make near-native looking programs, if you stick to the simple rule to use ttk everywhere and never try to override background colors etc. Another important rule is that icons play an important role. A decent icon set makes a big difference. An example of a Tk program on Windows 7 is this: http://artist.bam.de/en/gallery/screenshots/aRTistDemoversionStarted.jpg Would you spot that it is not a "native" Windows app? It's raw Tcl/Tk rather than Tkinter, but there is no specific reason why it couldn't be done in Python/Tkinter. On Linux, yes, the default themes are quite ugly. There are some workarounds, like loading the bitmap plastik theme, but this is substantially more (configuration) work. And in the end a decent look needs a decent designer - where to place which widgets, how to set the resizing options, that takes some experience to get it right. Christian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Camelot a good tool for me Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-22 09:59 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2015-05-22 12:38 +0000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-05-22 23:02 +1000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-22 15:11 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2015-05-22 14:29 +0100
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 15:57 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-05-22 19:24 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-23 03:37 +1000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 19:56 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-05-22 21:12 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-23 18:59 +1000
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it> - 2015-05-24 15:15 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 15:03 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me OT beauty of Tk Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-05-22 21:52 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me OT beauty of Tk Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-05-22 22:13 +0200
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-22 15:24 +0100
Re: Camelot a good tool for me felix <felix@epepm.cupet.cu> - 2015-05-22 10:50 -0400
Re: Camelot a good tool for me Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-05-24 07:05 -0500
csiph-web