Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams

References	<5190b049$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmr-HxE90KbA-VQvwHGdn9soQOfV9+b9coGZ_rrh6O4T4w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1637.1368468166.3114.python-list@python.org> <avcqgkFbdrbU1@mid.individual.net>
Date	2013-05-13 21:49 +0100
Subject	Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams
From	Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1642.1368478473.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 13 May 2013 19:48, "Neil Cerutti" <neilc@norwich.edu> wrote:
>
> On 2013-05-13, Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> 8. A programming language is low level when its programs
> >> require attention to the irrelevant.
> >>
> >> So much a matter of debate. Indentation is irrelevant, why
> >> should Python programs pay attention to it? Block delimiters
> >> are irrelevant too, the interpreter should be able to figure
> >> them out from the code layout. But this one is absolutely
> >> right:
> >
> > I think "irrelevant" in this context means stuff like memory
> > management.
>
> I thought I liked that one at first, but upon reflection it
> speciously inserts the word "irrelevant" in order to avoid
> stating a tautology: A programming language is low level when its
> programs require attention to low level details.
>
> --
> Neil Cerutti
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

It's not a tautology in disguise. Irrelevant != low level. When low level
details are relevant to the scope of my program, I use a low level language.

Thread

[Off topic] Software epigrams Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-13 09:20 +0000
  Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams "marduk@python.net" <marduk@python.net> - 2013-05-13 10:56 -0400
  Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 03:47 +1000
  Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-05-13 13:02 -0500
    Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-05-13 18:42 +0000
      Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 21:49 +0100
        Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-05-15 17:24 +0000
          Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-15 18:49 +0100
            Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-05-15 18:27 +0000
              Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-16 01:21 +0100
                Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-05-16 14:23 +0000
                Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 00:37 +1000
                Re: Software epigrams rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-05-16 08:06 -0700
                Re: Software epigrams Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 01:19 +1000
          python 2.7 vs 2.5 inq1ltd <inq1ltd@inqvista.com> - 2013-05-15 16:56 -0400
          sendmail smtplib.SMTP('localhost') Where is the email? inq1ltd <inq1ltd@inqvista.com> - 2013-05-30 15:48 -0400
          Re: sendmail smtplib.SMTP('localhost') Where is the email? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 08:13 +1000
          Re: sendmail smtplib.SMTP('localhost') Where is the email? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-05-30 19:23 -0400
  Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 04:12 +1000
    Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2013-05-14 03:08 +0000
      Re: [Off topic] Software epigrams Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 13:28 +1000
      Re: Software epigrams rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-05-15 20:55 -0700

csiph-web