Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #73103
| References | (2 earlier) <87bnubtgcv.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <20140609225632.942a3e42d9b05f050acd1b1d@gmx.net> <naked-objects-20140610045422@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mailman.10939.1402371156.18130.python-list@python.org> <Standard-Python-20140610054701@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2014-06-10 08:45 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.10955.1402412012.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes: >>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >>>AFAIK standard Python has no GUI library at all, so Java SE >>>and C# already are better than Python insofar as they >>>include a standard GUI toolkit at all! In Python one first >>>has to choose between more than a dozen of »GUI frameworks«, >>>and then the result of the comparison between Python and Java SE >>>would depend on that choice. >>Define "standard Python". > > »Standard Python 2.7.6 (or 3.4.1)« contains all those and > only those features that are available under every > implementation of Python 2.7.6 (or 3.4.1, respectively). > > It is the set of features an implementation must compass to > call itself »an implementation of Python 2.7.6 (or 3.4.1, > respectively)«. A circular and therefore useless definition. Given any implementation X and a feature Y not supported by X, one can equally well say that either 1) X is not an implementation of Python because Y is part of "standard Python"; or 2) Y is not part of "standard Python" because implementation X doesn't support it.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? "Ernest Bonat, Ph.D." <ernest.bonat@gmail.com> - 2014-06-01 10:37 -0700
[OT] Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2014-06-01 18:39 +0000
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2014-06-02 17:59 +0200
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-02 19:40 +0300
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2014-06-09 22:56 +0200
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 13:32 +1000
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 14:03 +1000
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 08:45 -0600
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-06-10 19:16 +0100
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-11 17:26 -0400
csiph-web