Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #73068
| References | (2 earlier) <87bnubtgcv.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <20140609225632.942a3e42d9b05f050acd1b1d@gmx.net> <naked-objects-20140610045422@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mailman.10939.1402371156.18130.python-list@python.org> <Standard-Python-20140610054701@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-10 14:03 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.10940.1402373048.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes: >>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >>>AFAIK standard Python has no GUI library at all, so Java SE >>>and C# already are better than Python insofar as they >>>include a standard GUI toolkit at all! In Python one first >>>has to choose between more than a dozen of »GUI frameworks«, >>>and then the result of the comparison between Python and Java SE >>>would depend on that choice. >>Define "standard Python". > > »Standard Python 2.7.6 (or 3.4.1)« contains all those and > only those features that are available under every > implementation of Python 2.7.6 (or 3.4.1, respectively). > > It is the set of features an implementation must compass to > call itself »an implementation of Python 2.7.6 (or 3.4.1, > respectively)«. The os module would have to be considered part of the standard library, but its contents differ according to your OS. And quite a bit of stuff isn't in a "python3-minimal" package on Debian - such as the threading module, which is definitely part of the standard library. So is python3-minimal not properly Python 3? By the way, how come when I quote your post and send stuff back UTF-8, your mailer then quotes it, doesn't transcode it, and sticks an ISO-8859-1 header on it? Note above, your quotes are borked. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? "Ernest Bonat, Ph.D." <ernest.bonat@gmail.com> - 2014-06-01 10:37 -0700
[OT] Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2014-06-01 18:39 +0000
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2014-06-02 17:59 +0200
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-02 19:40 +0300
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2014-06-09 22:56 +0200
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 13:32 +1000
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 14:03 +1000
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 08:45 -0600
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-06-10 19:16 +0100
Re: Is MVC Design Pattern good enough? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-11 17:26 -0400
csiph-web