Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657928
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity |
| Date | 2024-10-12 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <lmujuuF5spvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <ve5j7i$2jthj$1@dont-email.me> <XuyIJaxfFTfruSPJR8bWBtrAGq4@jntp> <ve81ld$333o4$1@dont-email.me> <YjSiiwllgxjO8USCxPs2jYwEQ3E@jntp> <vear43$3k24l$1@dont-email.me> |
Am Freitag000011, 11.10.2024 um 11:28 schrieb Mikko: > On 2024-10-10 12:33:14 +0000, Richard Hachel said: > >> Le 10/10/2024 à 10:01, Mikko a écrit : >>> The fog of words can be largely avoided by the use of equations. Words >>> are only needed when the equations need be connected to the real world. >>> For that purpose one should use well known words as much as possible and >>> definitions whenever the usual dictionary meaning is too obscure or >>> vague. >>> >>>> Especially the fog of concepts in SR, where it is very difficult for >> >> It is sometimes the fog of concepts that can generate the fog of words. >> I think that this is what has been happening first in relativity since >> 1905. >> Henri Poincaré had given the right equations, of great mathematical >> and physical perfection (mathematics must be applied to physical >> reality). >> We have the right equations, we know that it works, but we do not >> understand why it works. > > Special Relativity does not try to answer why God created the world the > way He did. It only attempts to describe how the world behaves, and only > about certain aspects of that behaviour. > This is actually not true, because the world which SRT describes isn't the world we live in. SRT is about a world, where all thinfgs drift around in a dark and starless void, in which any given velocity is indistiushable from being at rest and where all things move along a streight line. That not quite how the real world functions. In that real world there are, for instance, no streight lines. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-09-30 22:52 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 00:34 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-01 08:52 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 08:11 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:36 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:54 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 13:23 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 13:25 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-02 20:54 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:00 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-02 21:21 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:26 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-02 21:44 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:59 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-03 09:09 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:17 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:26 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:39 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:05 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:41 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:44 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:07 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-05 09:36 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-05 09:54 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:49 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:53 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-05 09:52 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-05 10:14 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-06 09:56 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-06 11:36 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-06 11:49 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-08 09:41 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-08 10:33 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-11 09:43 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 13:01 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-02 20:07 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-03 09:12 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:03 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:22 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:45 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-02 10:07 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-10-07 21:10 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-07 23:27 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-07 21:46 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-07 23:40 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-08 12:38 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-09 12:43 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-09 12:28 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-10 11:01 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-10 12:33 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-11 12:28 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-11 11:52 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 12:15 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-12 08:40 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-12 12:05 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 13:42 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-12 11:56 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 12:22 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 15:11 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 13:17 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 15:45 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 13:56 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 16:25 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-12 16:53 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-13 08:36 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 10:54 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-13 09:17 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 14:16 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-13 09:02 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-13 12:38 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-14 10:12 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-13 11:59 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-10-14 19:38 +0800
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-14 11:55 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-14 15:16 +0200
csiph-web