Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #654694
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. |
| Date | 2024-07-07 10:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <lev1c8Fl85bU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <6686f816$0$3283$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <v68col$3fag8$1@paganini.bofh.team> <2b08dc378555ea532b8bb69fb2f3b360@www.novabbs.com> <les1i7F7uhdU3@mid.individual.net> <vTeKYe70G9a4iuA4ZuS-FqbH7LI@jntp> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 13:41 schrieb Richard Hachel: > Le 06/07/2024 à 07:04, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 02:15 schrieb bertietaylor: >>> Conservation of charge is the only conservation law. >>> Rest is bollocks. >> >> >> I would say: no, charge is not 'observer invariant'. >> >> Actually I try to promote a concept, where the electron and a photon >> are the same thing, where the electron is circeling around in an atom, >> while the photon flies away in a streight line. >> >> The 'photoelectric effect' is then easy: >> >> in this concept a photon is kind of helical srew (wave packet). >> >> If that is stopped (e.g. by a metall screen) then the helical screw is >> 'knocked flat' and circles around a point, hence is an electron. >> >> A electron is actually not a real separate entity, but a certain >> aspect of a standing 'rotation wave'. >> >> The outer edge is called 'electron' and the inner turning point 'proton'. >> >> If the electron 'rolls away', it will become a photon. >> >> And if the photon gets stopped, it will become an electron. >> >> Therefore: charge is not conserved. >> >> >> TH > > C'est intéressant. > > Sauf que j'ai toujours dit que "the photon doesn't exist". > Sorry, but I understand only very little French ( a little but, but not much). So, please, say it again, but in English. (german would be ok, too, but I guess you don't speak that). TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-21 20:04 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-21 22:36 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-21 21:07 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-22 14:21 +0300
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-23 02:26 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-23 13:10 +0300
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Joda Muromtsov Hui <omodo@tr.ru> - 2024-06-23 14:39 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-21 21:13 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-22 11:26 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-22 11:50 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 07:54 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 07:57 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 08:12 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-23 10:48 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 07:25 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-23 02:21 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-21 22:10 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Darrell Wojewódzki <eee@jdg.pl> - 2024-06-21 22:33 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-21 23:00 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-21 18:10 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-22 03:02 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-22 14:26 +0300
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-22 11:26 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 07:52 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 07:53 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-22 18:11 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-23 10:48 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-23 13:14 +0300
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-23 12:21 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-23 13:46 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-23 02:27 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-23 10:48 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-23 03:01 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-23 13:18 +0300
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-06-22 14:59 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-22 15:11 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-06-23 02:54 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-06-22 23:13 -0500
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-23 07:48 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-23 10:48 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-23 10:55 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-06-24 22:57 -0500
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-25 07:16 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Stuart Balboni <nioo@altta.it> - 2024-06-25 05:25 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-25 08:49 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-25 10:39 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 13:05 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-26 09:20 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-06-26 09:24 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-26 09:43 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 12:50 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-04 21:29 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-04 21:51 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-04 13:04 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-05 21:00 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 17:53 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-06 21:56 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-06 19:27 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-07 12:39 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-07 13:01 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-08 10:57 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-08 13:41 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-10 17:43 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-10 12:58 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Leolin Balakirev <vnl@lilleoio.ru> - 2024-07-05 09:01 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-07-06 00:15 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-06 07:04 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-06 11:41 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-06 12:37 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-07 10:19 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-07 11:51 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-07-07 21:23 +0200
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-07-06 11:48 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 07:17 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Rollie Kokoris Lao <roi@rsok.gr> - 2024-06-23 14:51 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-23 12:06 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-26 10:42 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-27 21:23 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-28 09:45 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-28 10:03 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-30 09:07 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-30 09:25 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-06-24 19:58 +0000
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 18:05 -0700
Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 19:52 -0700
csiph-web