Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #625532
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science |
| Date | 2023-12-11 07:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ktnmntF9sp1U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <ukvuer$1s121$4@dont-email.me> <d9b4c475-fe63-4fb0-adb2-2d1feb5f9bc0n@googlegroups.com> <ul4t5g$2onab$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgn3F1j5uU1@mid.individual.net> <ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 11.12.2023 um 04:21 schrieb Volney: >>>> I have to ask myself: 1) Did you take your medications? ; 2) Did you >>>> really go to HS?; 3) Have you procreated? >>>> >>>> >>> 1) It certainly appears you didn't take your medicine, at least not >>> the antipsychotics. >>> 2) I can't be sure but you didn't manage to get a high school >>> education in sciences. >>> 3) I hope you didn't! >> >> The problem concerning a high school science education has to do with >> those who think the only aspects worthy of learning are the ones that >> directly impact the narrow subdiscipline that interests them. They >> take up space in the room and more or less pay attention where the >> topic of >> the day sounds as though it may have something to do with their >> interest (these days usually some subdiscipline of electronics.) >> > This sounds like a variant of what Odd Bodkin and others noted: Why are > so many cranks electrical engineers? This is so, because electrical engineers have a MUCH better understanding of magnetism and electricity than usual physicists. Since everybody who dares to criticise mainstream physics is called 'crank' (or: psycho, Nazi, crackpot, nutcase...), physicists call all electrical enigineers 'crank'. But much worse than the electrical cranks are the other variants of engineers (like e.g. myself), who simply refuse to accept illogic nonsense. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-04 13:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-04 17:22 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-04 16:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-05 00:17 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 23:37 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 16:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 19:39 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 16:54 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 21:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 01:32 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 23:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-08 10:40 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 10:06 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:53 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:29 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:43 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 20:05 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:16 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:38 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:33 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 13:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 22:45 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 23:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:40 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 22:20 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 23:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-13 01:03 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-13 01:13 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Zachariah Dobrenkov Bakhmatoff <earz@rhvzahhb.az> - 2023-12-13 14:01 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-12 23:26 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-13 13:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-14 00:30 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 18:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 22:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 22:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-09 11:17 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 19:05 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-09 16:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:50 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-10 13:12 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-10 15:15 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:42 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-11 08:13 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 16:48 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:56 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-10 10:36 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 17:46 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:30 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 14:16 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 14:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:49 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:33 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 20:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:35 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 13:07 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:18 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 09:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 13:06 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Kimanee Jamaletdinov Baboshin <dlna@oeameeim.ed> - 2023-12-08 18:14 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:48 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 18:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-12-09 13:51 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 05:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Emanuele Harlashenkov Balabuha <lsle@emenkkrv.ea> - 2023-12-08 18:30 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:52 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thurston Zheleznov Bakatin <elvs@zuttutnu.tt> - 2023-12-09 16:22 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 12:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:56 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:35 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 18:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:11 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 15:21 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 15:26 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:15 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:14 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:39 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-10 13:09 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:21 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-11 07:01 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-11 08:18 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-12 07:12 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Herlen Ablesimoff Bibin <bemf@heeleine.em> - 2023-12-07 20:48 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:03 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Brennan Gastello <nala@asrnoegr.ge> - 2023-12-08 16:18 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 23:09 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Fiezal Guio <fooi@fzzuifga.ag> - 2023-12-08 15:48 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:46 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 08:40 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 11:12 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 15:23 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 13:11 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 17:38 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Giovanni Dikson Muzhkaterov <niii@ngoiinvi.vk> - 2023-12-07 22:50 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 14:19 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 17:43 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Patricia Derman <ainr@eencnnic.ar> - 2023-12-07 18:16 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Monday Vaginov <viom@odvnoavv.gn> - 2023-12-07 17:49 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Dennie Handokhin Momotov <iedi@hennnoie.ne> - 2023-12-07 18:56 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:55 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 20:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 10:52 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-12 07:20 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 15:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 15:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 13:23 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 14:05 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-06 10:44 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:42 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:51 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 07:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 07:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 13:12 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 10:55 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 16:06 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:56 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:11 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 17:39 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 13:42 -0800
csiph-web