Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #625093
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-04 23:37 -0800 |
| References | <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com> <jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com> <3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> |
| Message-ID | <f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science |
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 at 07:17:25 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 12/4/23 6:30 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Monday, December 4, 2023 at 3:22:39 PM UTC-8, Tom Roberts wrote: > >> On 12/4/23 3:10 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>> The Big Bang and the Center of the Universe The velocity-distance > >>> relationship interprets the redshift-distance relationship as > >>> caused by the Doppler shift of starlight. This relationship is > >>> the same in every direction from Earth. This requires we are at > >>> the center of the universe. > >> Nope! In a homogeneous and isotropic universe this would hold at > >> any location, and THERE IS NO "CENTER". > > > > There is a center in a finite, homogeneous, and isotropic universe. > You have insufficient imagination. This is simply not true. > > For example, the surface of the sphere S^2 is finite, homogeneous, and > isotropic, yet it has no "center". Oh, yes, poor halfbrain, a sphere absolutely has a center. > As you probably don't understand this, I mean no center > IN THE MANIFOLD ITSELF. For sure you have no brain, poor halfbrain - I mean you don't have it in stomach.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-04 13:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-04 17:22 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-04 16:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-05 00:17 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 23:37 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 16:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 19:39 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 16:54 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 21:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 01:32 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 23:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-08 10:40 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 10:06 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:53 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:29 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:43 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 20:05 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:16 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:38 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:33 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 13:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 22:45 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 23:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:40 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 22:20 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 23:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-13 01:03 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-13 01:13 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Zachariah Dobrenkov Bakhmatoff <earz@rhvzahhb.az> - 2023-12-13 14:01 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-12 23:26 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-13 13:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-14 00:30 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 18:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 22:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 22:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-09 11:17 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 19:05 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-09 16:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:50 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-10 13:12 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-10 15:15 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:42 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-11 08:13 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 16:48 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:56 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-10 10:36 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 17:46 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:30 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 14:16 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 14:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:49 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:33 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 20:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:35 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 13:07 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:18 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 09:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 13:06 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Kimanee Jamaletdinov Baboshin <dlna@oeameeim.ed> - 2023-12-08 18:14 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:48 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 18:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-12-09 13:51 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 05:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Emanuele Harlashenkov Balabuha <lsle@emenkkrv.ea> - 2023-12-08 18:30 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:52 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thurston Zheleznov Bakatin <elvs@zuttutnu.tt> - 2023-12-09 16:22 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 12:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:56 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:35 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 18:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:11 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 15:21 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 15:26 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:15 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:14 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:39 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-10 13:09 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:21 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-11 07:01 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-11 08:18 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-12 07:12 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Herlen Ablesimoff Bibin <bemf@heeleine.em> - 2023-12-07 20:48 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:03 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Brennan Gastello <nala@asrnoegr.ge> - 2023-12-08 16:18 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 23:09 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Fiezal Guio <fooi@fzzuifga.ag> - 2023-12-08 15:48 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:46 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 08:40 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 11:12 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 15:23 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 13:11 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 17:38 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Giovanni Dikson Muzhkaterov <niii@ngoiinvi.vk> - 2023-12-07 22:50 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 14:19 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 17:43 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Patricia Derman <ainr@eencnnic.ar> - 2023-12-07 18:16 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Monday Vaginov <viom@odvnoavv.gn> - 2023-12-07 17:49 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Dennie Handokhin Momotov <iedi@hennnoie.ne> - 2023-12-07 18:56 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:55 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 20:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 10:52 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-12 07:20 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 15:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 15:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 13:23 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 14:05 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-06 10:44 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:42 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:51 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 07:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 07:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 13:12 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 10:55 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 16:06 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:56 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:11 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 17:39 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 13:42 -0800
csiph-web