Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #625591
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science |
| Date | 2023-12-12 07:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ktqbnsFs6ikU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <d9b4c475-fe63-4fb0-adb2-2d1feb5f9bc0n@googlegroups.com> <ul4t5g$2onab$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgn3F1j5uU1@mid.individual.net> <ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me> <ktok1iFgu35U2@mid.individual.net> |
Am 11.12.2023 um 15:18 schrieb whodat: >> This sounds like a variant of what Odd Bodkin and others noted: Why >> are so many cranks electrical engineers? > > In my father's day (early 20th century) The most popular discipline was > mechanical engineering. I predict that rocket science will be next, of > course I won't be around to see it. > No, the 'Next Big Thing' will be 'Flying Saucers'. Rockets are a thing from the past. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-04 13:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-04 17:22 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-04 16:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-05 00:17 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 23:37 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 16:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 19:39 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 16:54 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 21:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 01:32 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 23:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-08 10:40 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 10:06 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:53 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:29 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:43 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 20:05 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:16 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:38 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:33 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 13:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 22:45 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 23:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:40 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 22:20 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 23:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-13 01:03 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-13 01:13 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Zachariah Dobrenkov Bakhmatoff <earz@rhvzahhb.az> - 2023-12-13 14:01 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-12 23:26 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-13 13:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-14 00:30 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 18:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 22:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-14 22:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-09 11:17 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 19:05 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-09 16:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:50 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-10 13:12 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-10 15:15 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:42 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-11 08:13 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 16:48 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:56 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-10 10:36 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 17:46 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:30 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 14:16 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 14:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:49 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:33 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 20:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:35 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 13:07 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:18 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 09:04 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 13:06 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Kimanee Jamaletdinov Baboshin <dlna@oeameeim.ed> - 2023-12-08 18:14 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:48 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 18:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-12-09 13:51 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 05:30 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Emanuele Harlashenkov Balabuha <lsle@emenkkrv.ea> - 2023-12-08 18:30 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:52 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thurston Zheleznov Bakatin <elvs@zuttutnu.tt> - 2023-12-09 16:22 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 12:31 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:56 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 18:35 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 18:28 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:11 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:08 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 15:21 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 15:26 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:15 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 19:14 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 12:39 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-10 13:09 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-10 22:21 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-11 07:01 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-11 08:18 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-12 07:12 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Herlen Ablesimoff Bibin <bemf@heeleine.em> - 2023-12-07 20:48 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 18:03 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Brennan Gastello <nala@asrnoegr.ge> - 2023-12-08 16:18 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 23:09 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Fiezal Guio <fooi@fzzuifga.ag> - 2023-12-08 15:48 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 00:46 -0600
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-05 08:40 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 11:12 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 15:23 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 13:11 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 17:38 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Giovanni Dikson Muzhkaterov <niii@ngoiinvi.vk> - 2023-12-07 22:50 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 14:19 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-05 17:43 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Patricia Derman <ainr@eencnnic.ar> - 2023-12-07 18:16 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Monday Vaginov <viom@odvnoavv.gn> - 2023-12-07 17:49 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Dennie Handokhin Momotov <iedi@hennnoie.ne> - 2023-12-07 18:56 +0000
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:55 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 20:02 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 10:52 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-12-12 07:20 +0100
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 15:22 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-12-04 15:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 13:23 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-05 14:05 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-06 10:44 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:42 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-07 14:51 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 07:10 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 07:27 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 13:12 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 10:55 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-08 16:06 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-08 13:56 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-09 12:11 -0500
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 17:39 -0800
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 13:42 -0800
csiph-web