Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #602544
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. |
| Date | 2023-02-28 16:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k67ereFdjuU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <c75b4813-8617-46f1-9911-fe9231f8a55bn@googlegroups.com> <Gd2cnT6jY4WLBWb-nZ2dnZfqlJ_-fwAA@giganews.com> <6baecfe6-3834-4888-b2ee-29f144dc8ec5n@googlegroups.com> <jaydneMzOLUe-GP-nZ2dnZfqlJz8fwAA@giganews.com> <2fc051d1-0397-4e87-b6df-112b21fa62a2n@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/28/2023 4:23 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 5:35:27 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote: >> On 2/26/23 2:16 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: >>> On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 2:34:20 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote: >>>> In 1905 Einstein regarded Maxwell's equations as laws of nature. >>> >>> How would you possibly know that? >> >> Because Einstein stated that in several places. >> >>> [... further nonsense ignored] >> >> Tom Roberts > > For a person that claim to hold a PhD in physics, you SUCK with your assertions without any reference. > > Too lazy to do that, or just CAN'T BACK UP with facts your assertions? > > It's too easy to go around parroting, pretending that your comments be accepted like if coming from the supreme, absolute thinker. > > We had Bodkin for that, but he "was" a woodworker. > > Put more substance on your claims, and gain respect. LINKS or it didn't happen. > > Learn a bit from Paul Andersen's M.O. > google "einstein's references to Maxwell's works" About 3,440,000 results At the same time you're right about he etiquette of this situation, where references are known to be available they should be cited.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 15:32 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 16:34 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 18:24 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:57 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 08:19 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Aldo <aldo.mayme.11084@cap.edu.mx> - 2023-02-17 16:58 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 17:15 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-17 17:56 -0800
Crank Pat Dolan kisses ass to fellow crank Richard Hertz "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 18:00 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 20:42 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 23:50 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 03:50 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 10:31 +0100
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:03 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 05:09 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 05:53 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:09 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:35 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 08:56 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 19:12 +0100
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 11:59 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 14:03 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 22:13 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 12:48 -0800
BONGTALK (or worse) (was Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 16:39 -0600
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 01:13 -0800
Crank Richard Hertz repeats the same lies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 10:36 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz repeats the same lies Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 11:25 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 23:24 +0100
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 00:37 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-21 14:01 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 14:12 -0800
Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 14:16 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 01:51 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:33 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 23:52 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 13:49 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-24 10:46 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-26 11:34 -0600
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-26 10:28 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-27 12:05 -0600
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 19:56 +0100
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:59 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 12:41 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 22:42 +0100
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 21:51 +0000
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:50 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-27 14:04 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:08 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 23:28 +0100
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 18:37 -0500
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-27 17:55 -0600
Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:57 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:58 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 12:16 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 02:24 -0500
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 00:10 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 05:06 -0800
Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:16 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:42 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:56 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 12:38 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:13 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:36 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:55 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:08 -0800
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-28 00:42 -0500
Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 23:02 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-27 11:36 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-28 00:26 -0500
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:58 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-28 14:35 -0600
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-28 12:49 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 14:23 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-28 16:51 -0600
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 15:22 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-28 15:35 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-28 19:07 -0600
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 12:01 -0800
Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> - 2023-02-26 22:17 +0000
csiph-web