Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #601968

Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007.

From Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007.
Date 2023-02-22 19:12 +0100
Message-ID <k5n481Ff015U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <6a36c753-7f30-42d5-94ab-4c596bebd4e3n@googlegroups.com> <48c95fbb-b0e2-4419-b318-adb0be7de169n@googlegroups.com> <ca7e55fc-23e9-4ac6-b378-706a517bd061n@googlegroups.com> <eaf85721-829c-470d-85c7-0f3582629005n@googlegroups.com> <4c00c8c6-c0bd-4de3-844d-e647b7053480n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2023-02-22 16:56:17 +0000, JanPB said:

> On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 3:35:16 PM UTC+1, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 11:09:34 AM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
>>> On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 2:53:31 PM UTC+1, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>> - Then came Voigt, inventing relativity, gamma factor, length 
>>>> contraction and local time.
>>> Voigt didn't invent relativity just like Laplace didn't invent the 
>>> Schwarzschild radius.
>> <snip>
>> 
>> Yes he did, imbecile, and 100 years before the cretins.
> 
> No. And fix your mental problem. Repeating the word "cretins" in this
> context is indicative of your belief magic incantations will come true
> when repeated.

Another one Alan B. will want to ban, if he has any consistency, which I doubt.
> 
>> Schwarzschild Radius Before General Relativity: Why Does 
>> Michell-Laplace Argument Provide the Correct Answer?
>> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-009-9315-8
> 
> It's just a formula coincidence. It happens. Just like it happened with Voigt.


-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

 Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked  R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 15:32 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 16:34 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 18:24 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:57 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 08:19 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Aldo <aldo.mayme.11084@cap.edu.mx> - 2023-02-17 16:58 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 17:15 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-17 17:56 -0800
    Crank Pat Dolan kisses ass to fellow crank Richard Hertz "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 18:00 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 20:42 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 23:50 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 03:50 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked  R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 10:31 +0100
    Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:03 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 05:09 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 05:53 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:09 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:35 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 08:56 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley   Laboratory, in 2007. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 19:12 +0100
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 11:59 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 14:03 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 22:13 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley  Laboratory, in 2007. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 12:48 -0800
                BONGTALK (or worse) (was Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 16:39 -0600
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 01:13 -0800
            Crank Richard Hertz repeats the same lies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 10:36 -0800
              Re: Crank Richard Hertz repeats the same lies Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 11:25 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 23:24 +0100
        Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 00:37 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-21 14:01 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 14:12 -0800
          Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 14:16 -0800
            Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 01:51 -0800
              Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:33 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 23:52 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 13:49 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-24 10:46 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-26 11:34 -0600
      Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-26 10:28 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-27 12:05 -0600
          Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 19:56 +0100
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:59 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 12:41 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 22:42 +0100
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 21:51 +0000
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:50 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-27 14:04 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:08 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 23:28 +0100
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 18:37 -0500
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-27 17:55 -0600
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:57 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:58 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 12:16 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 02:24 -0500
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 00:10 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 05:06 -0800
            Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:16 -0800
              Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:42 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:56 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 12:38 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:13 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:36 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:55 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:08 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-28 00:42 -0500
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 23:02 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-27 11:36 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-28 00:26 -0500
              Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:58 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-28 14:35 -0600
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-28 12:49 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 14:23 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-28 16:51 -0600
              Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 15:22 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-28 15:35 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-28 19:07 -0600
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 12:01 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> - 2023-02-26 22:17 +0000

csiph-web