Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #602562

Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007.

From	whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007.
Date	2023-02-28 19:07 -0600
Message-ID	<k67mqsF1t66U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <6baecfe6-3834-4888-b2ee-29f144dc8ec5n@googlegroups.com> <jaydneMzOLUe-GP-nZ2dnZfqlJz8fwAA@giganews.com> <2fc051d1-0397-4e87-b6df-112b21fa62a2n@googlegroups.com> <k67ereFdjuU4@mid.individual.net> <075bbd4e-3d90-4e48-bb79-f03688a844b6n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/28/2023 5:22 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 7:51:29 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
>> On 2/28/2023 4:23 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 5:35:27 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote:
>>>> On 2/26/23 2:16 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 2:34:20 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote:
>>>>>> In 1905 Einstein regarded Maxwell's equations as laws of nature.
>>>>>
>>>>> How would you possibly know that?
>>>>
>>>> Because Einstein stated that in several places.
>>>>
>>>>> [... further nonsense ignored]
>>>>
>>>> Tom Roberts
>>>
>>> For a person that claim to hold a PhD in physics, you SUCK with your assertions without any reference.
>>>
>>> Too lazy to do that, or just CAN'T BACK UP with facts your assertions?
>>>
>>> It's too easy to go around parroting, pretending that your comments be accepted like if coming from the supreme, absolute thinker.
>>>
>>> We had Bodkin for that, but he "was" a woodworker.
>>>
>>> Put more substance on your claims, and gain respect. LINKS or it didn't happen.
>>>
>>> Learn a bit from Paul Andersen's M.O.
>>>
>> google "einstein's references to Maxwell's works"
>>
>> About 3,440,000 results
>>
>> At the same time you're right about he etiquette of this situation,
>> where references are known to be available they should be cited.
> 
> The correct search should be "Einstein regarded Maxwell's equations as laws of nature", or similar.
> 
> You'll be disappointed. ZERO finds, even breaking it as  "Einstein" "Maxwell's equations" "laws of nature".

So I asked google " dick hertz gets something right" with the expectation
that I would get zero hits. But then google doesn't always live up to 
the premise/promise and back came "About 44,100,000 results."

Of course none of them that I saw actually addressed the question, 
instead they focused on the name "Dick Hertz" and I'm not about to
take the time to review anything beyond the first page of results.

Using the exact wording you suggested by "cut n paste" I got a
surprising "About 4,520,000 results." So you were as wrong as
I was and probably for the same reason, google will give
replies if at all possible even if it is wrong.

What's left is the question whether or not you believe good etiquette
requires a citation where one is available, a piece of thread drift that
I introduced. Considering that I did that, are you actually content with
the answer you gave?

Thread

 Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked  R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 15:32 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 16:34 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 18:24 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:57 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 08:19 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Aldo <aldo.mayme.11084@cap.edu.mx> - 2023-02-17 16:58 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 17:15 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-17 17:56 -0800
    Crank Pat Dolan kisses ass to fellow crank Richard Hertz "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 18:00 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 20:42 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 23:50 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 03:50 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked  R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 10:31 +0100
    Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:03 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 05:09 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 05:53 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:09 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:35 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 08:56 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley   Laboratory, in 2007. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 19:12 +0100
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 11:59 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 14:03 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 22:13 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley  Laboratory, in 2007. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 12:48 -0800
                BONGTALK (or worse) (was Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 16:39 -0600
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 01:13 -0800
            Crank Richard Hertz repeats the same lies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 10:36 -0800
              Re: Crank Richard Hertz repeats the same lies Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 11:25 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 23:24 +0100
        Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 00:37 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-21 14:01 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 14:12 -0800
          Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 14:16 -0800
            Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 01:51 -0800
              Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps "sustaining" "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 06:33 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 23:52 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 13:49 -0800
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-24 10:46 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-26 11:34 -0600
      Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-26 10:28 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-27 12:05 -0600
          Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 19:56 +0100
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:59 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 12:41 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 22:42 +0100
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 21:51 +0000
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:50 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-27 14:04 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:08 -0800
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-27 23:28 +0100
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 18:37 -0500
              Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-27 17:55 -0600
                Re: Why no Einstein's laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:57 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:58 -0800
      Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 12:16 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 02:24 -0500
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 00:10 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 05:06 -0800
            Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:16 -0800
              Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:42 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 10:56 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 12:38 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:13 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:36 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:55 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 14:08 -0800
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-28 00:42 -0500
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz eats shit. A lot of it Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 23:02 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-27 11:36 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-28 00:26 -0500
              Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 22:58 -0800
        Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-28 14:35 -0600
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-28 12:49 -0800
          Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 14:23 -0800
            Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-28 16:51 -0600
              Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 15:22 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-02-28 15:35 -0800
                Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-28 19:07 -0600
  Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 12:01 -0800
    Re: Why no Einstein’s laws?, asked R.W. Kadel from Berkeley Laboratory, in 2007. Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> - 2023-02-26 22:17 +0000

csiph-web