Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #600925
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic |
| Date | 2023-02-06 20:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k4dr03F2abjU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <5749f10b-01d7-4cbe-ab72-e3720acc9c5dn@googlegroups.com> <0c7ec3a8-e202-446b-98d5-14f1d557a546n@googlegroups.com> <c9a276e3-7c63-485d-bcb4-9c67c9865712n@googlegroups.com> <trs9r2$39m7i$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2/6/2023 7:34 PM, Volney wrote: > On 2/6/2023 3:57 PM, patdolan wrote: >> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:58:13 AM UTC-8, seto...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:32:45 PM UTC-5, Pentcho Valev wrote: > >>>> See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev >>>> >>> There is no asymmetry dilation of absolute time.. What this mean is >>> that a clock second (clock time) contains a different amount of >>> absolute time is differet frames. >>> On earth a clock second is representedy 9,192,3631,770 transitions of >>> the Cs 133 atom. Up at the GPS a clock second is represented by >>> 9,192,631,774.1617 transitions of Cs 133 atom. These two different >>> definitions represent the same amount of absolute time but at >>> different locations. > >> I am aghast that Pentcho's unmasking of Einstein's illogical gaff has >> not generated more views/comments in this forum. > > Can we get a three way kꚙkfight going?? A kꙫꙫk threesome? No such luck. Dolan doesn't believe a word of what he says.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-04 13:32 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-05 05:01 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 19:33 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> - 2023-02-06 01:48 +0000
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:58 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 12:57 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 18:11 -0600
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 17:28 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:21 -0600
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-06 20:34 -0500
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:22 -0600
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 18:58 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 22:01 -0600
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 22:08 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:29 -0600
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-07 09:59 -0800
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 13:23 -0600
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 14:37 -0500
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 22:16 +0000
Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 19:20 -0800
csiph-web