Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #600931

Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic

From whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic
Date 2023-02-06 22:01 -0600
Message-ID <k4e0p8F35baU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <0c7ec3a8-e202-446b-98d5-14f1d557a546n@googlegroups.com> <c9a276e3-7c63-485d-bcb4-9c67c9865712n@googlegroups.com> <trs9r2$39m7i$1@dont-email.me> <k4dr03F2abjU2@mid.individual.net> <5d429552-1c9d-4c3b-9b49-58046930baf0n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/6/2023 8:58 PM, patdolan wrote:
> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:23:03 PM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
>> On 2/6/2023 7:34 PM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 2/6/2023 3:57 PM, patdolan wrote:
>>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:58:13 AM UTC-8, seto...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:32:45 PM UTC-5, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
>>>>>>
>>>>> There is no asymmetry dilation of absolute time.. What this mean is
>>>>> that a clock second (clock time) contains a different amount of
>>>>> absolute time is differet frames.
>>>>> On earth a clock second is representedy 9,192,3631,770 transitions of
>>>>> the Cs 133 atom. Up at the GPS a clock second is represented by
>>>>> 9,192,631,774.1617 transitions of Cs 133 atom. These two different
>>>>> definitions represent the same amount of absolute time but at
>>>>> different locations.
>>>
>>>> I am aghast that Pentcho's unmasking of Einstein's illogical gaff has
>>>> not generated more views/comments in this forum.
>>>
>>> Can we get a three way kꚙkfight going?? A kꙫꙫk threesome?
>> No such luck. Dolan doesn't believe a word of what he says.
> Out-effing-rageous !

Whazzat, that you're so transparent?

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-04 13:32 -0800
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-05 05:01 -0800
    Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 19:33 -0800
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> - 2023-02-06 01:48 +0000
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:58 -0800
    Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 12:57 -0800
      Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 18:11 -0600
        Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 17:28 -0800
          Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:21 -0600
      Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-06 20:34 -0500
        Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:22 -0600
          Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 18:58 -0800
            Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 22:01 -0600
              Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 22:08 -0800
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:29 -0600
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-07 09:59 -0800
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 13:23 -0600
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 14:37 -0500
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 22:16 +0000
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 19:20 -0800

csiph-web