Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #600948

Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/7/2023 12:08 AM, patdolan wrote:
> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 8:01:47 PM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
>> On 2/6/2023 8:58 PM, patdolan wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:23:03 PM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
>>>> On 2/6/2023 7:34 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>>> On 2/6/2023 3:57 PM, patdolan wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:58:13 AM UTC-8, seto...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:32:45 PM UTC-5, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no asymmetry dilation of absolute time.. What this mean is
>>>>>>> that a clock second (clock time) contains a different amount of
>>>>>>> absolute time is differet frames.
>>>>>>> On earth a clock second is representedy 9,192,3631,770 transitions of
>>>>>>> the Cs 133 atom. Up at the GPS a clock second is represented by
>>>>>>> 9,192,631,774.1617 transitions of Cs 133 atom. These two different
>>>>>>> definitions represent the same amount of absolute time but at
>>>>>>> different locations.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am aghast that Pentcho's unmasking of Einstein's illogical gaff has
>>>>>> not generated more views/comments in this forum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we get a three way kꚙkfight going?? A kꙫꙫk threesome?
>>>> No such luck. Dolan doesn't believe a word of what he says.
>>> Out-effing-rageous !
>> Whazzat, that you're so transparent?
> Ha!! You reveal yourself whodatMAKER.  Only the Starmaker would concatenate the letters W. h. a. z. z. a. t.

Not Starmaker, you idiot. I'm old enough that whazzat is coming back
into vogue again. My mother couldn't understand why "roaring 20's"
parties were becoming popular during my college days because she had
lived and partied through the original ones and thought them boring.

But then you're desperate to find something, anything, about the
mystery I purposely evoke using my moniker. I use this moniker to
avoid exposing my real name that I used last time I was in the
sci.physics newsgroups. Too bad if you're having a tough time
dealing with it,

BTW, Starmaker is extremely shallow "back of the classroom cutup kid"
who may be enjoying himself but definitely isn't contributing anything
to these newsgroups lacking *any* knowledge about the legitimate topics
discussed here. He's not even a crank because he doesn't know enough on
topic. He is every bit as much an idiot and fool as you are.

But go ahead and keep clutching at straws if that's what trips your
trigger. I know who I am and that isn't anyone you know. The only one
around long enough to know me is Moroney, and I think he's given up
trying to figure me out. Just as well because I like him as the
knowledgeable poster he is, so rare these days. I'm sorry to see him
dropping off these days but then his mission seems to be posting less
than in the past.

I know that doesn't clear anything up for you but then I don't really
care about that.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-04 13:32 -0800
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-05 05:01 -0800
    Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 19:33 -0800
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> - 2023-02-06 01:48 +0000
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:58 -0800
    Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 12:57 -0800
      Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 18:11 -0600
        Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 17:28 -0800
          Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:21 -0600
      Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-06 20:34 -0500
        Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:22 -0600
          Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 18:58 -0800
            Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 22:01 -0600
              Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 22:08 -0800
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:29 -0600
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-07 09:59 -0800
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 13:23 -0600
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 14:37 -0500
                Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 22:16 +0000
  Re: Why Einsteinians Abuse Logic Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 19:20 -0800

csiph-web