Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #597876
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: New papers: SR versus ... |
| Date | 2022-12-19 14:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k0bud2F3j84U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <14b0b9c4-4e00-4b40-90fa-eca40e387103n@googlegroups.com> <k05858F18n6U1@mid.individual.net> <efb4b875-3a61-4d77-ae30-b3295a0febfdn@googlegroups.com> |
On 12/19/2022 7:54 AM, beda pietanza wrote: > Il giorno sabato 17 dicembre 2022 alle 08:07:23 UTC+1 Thomas Heger ha scritto: >> Am 04.12.2022 um 20:16 schrieb erkd...@gmail.com: >>> All from 1st-3rd December 2022: >>> >>> SR vs. relative acceleration: >>> "Relative acceleration vs. special relativity" >>> http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23399.93602 >> >> Quote >> "Unfortunately, the physical criteria for special relativity (which >> models inertia in the absence of gravitation), and for the PoE (which >> says that we cannot have inertia without gravitation), are mutually >> exclusive." >> >> Inertia is the behaviour or material objects to maintain course and >> speed, if not affected by a force. >> >> Why and how does this require gravitation? >> >> TH > beda: > inertia is the local effects of the gravitation of the total masses of the universe Wow!!!!! Completely new definition unheard elsewhere. > gravity is the local effect of a near masses Considering that gravity has no distance boundary... I think it best to excise the remainder of your posting. In fact I think it best to excise all of your future postings before they occupy space on my computer and/or waste my time. Get better soon.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-04 11:16 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-04 13:09 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 07:33 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 12:06 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 18:20 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 18:33 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 18:54 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-07 18:15 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-07 20:03 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 18:13 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-12 23:50 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 18:14 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 18:17 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 18:21 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 18:23 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 18:24 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 18:52 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 20:49 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-12 23:50 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-12 22:12 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-13 04:17 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-13 03:41 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-14 08:22 +0100
Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 09:33 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 17:53 +0000
Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:44 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-17 08:07 +0100
Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 05:54 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 14:03 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Vitaliy Bazzoli <zvt@viavzl.oi> - 2022-12-19 22:05 +0000
Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 16:09 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Vitaliy Bazzoli <zvt@viavzl.oi> - 2022-12-19 22:21 +0000
Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 17:37 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Vitaliy Bazzoli <zvt@viavzl.oi> - 2022-12-20 00:00 +0000
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 19:53 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 23:14 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-12-20 12:01 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-20 14:34 -0600
Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 07:35 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-20 07:39 +0100
Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 03:24 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-21 09:43 +0100
Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 06:55 -0800
Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-24 10:05 +0100
csiph-web