Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #597876

Re: New papers: SR versus ...

From	whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: New papers: SR versus ...
Date	2022-12-19 14:03 -0600
Message-ID	<k0bud2F3j84U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<14b0b9c4-4e00-4b40-90fa-eca40e387103n@googlegroups.com> <k05858F18n6U1@mid.individual.net> <efb4b875-3a61-4d77-ae30-b3295a0febfdn@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/19/2022 7:54 AM, beda pietanza wrote:
> Il giorno sabato 17 dicembre 2022 alle 08:07:23 UTC+1 Thomas Heger ha scritto:
>> Am 04.12.2022 um 20:16 schrieb erkd...@gmail.com:
>>> All from 1st-3rd December 2022:
>>>
>>> SR vs. relative acceleration:
>>> "Relative acceleration vs. special relativity"
>>> http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23399.93602
>>
>> Quote
>> "Unfortunately, the physical criteria for special relativity (which
>> models inertia in the absence of gravitation), and for the PoE (which
>> says that we cannot have inertia without gravitation), are mutually
>> exclusive."
>>
>> Inertia is the behaviour or material objects to maintain course and
>> speed, if not affected by a force.
>>
>> Why and how does this require gravitation?
>>
>> TH
> beda:
> inertia is the local effects of the gravitation of the total masses of the universe

Wow!!!!! Completely new definition unheard elsewhere.

> gravity is the local effect of a near masses

Considering that gravity has no distance boundary...

I think it best to excise the remainder of your posting.  In fact I 
think it best to excise all of your future postings before they
occupy space on my computer and/or waste my time. Get better soon.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-17 08:07 +0100
  Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 05:54 -0800
    Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 14:03 -0600
      Re: New papers: SR versus ... Vitaliy Bazzoli <zvt@viavzl.oi> - 2022-12-19 22:05 +0000
        Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 16:09 -0600
          Re: New papers: SR versus ... Vitaliy Bazzoli <zvt@viavzl.oi> - 2022-12-19 22:21 +0000
            Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 17:37 -0600
              Re: New papers: SR versus ... Vitaliy Bazzoli <zvt@viavzl.oi> - 2022-12-20 00:00 +0000
                Re: New papers: SR versus ... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 19:53 -0800
                Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 23:14 -0600
      Re: New papers: SR versus ... RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-12-20 12:01 -0800
        Re: New papers: SR versus ... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-20 14:34 -0600
        Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 07:35 -0800
    Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-20 07:39 +0100
      Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 03:24 -0800
        Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-21 09:43 +0100
          Re: New papers: SR versus ... beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 06:55 -0800
            Re: New papers: SR versus ... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-24 10:05 +0100

csiph-web