Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #597141

Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction?

From whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction?
Date 2022-12-09 16:16 -0600
Message-ID <jvhqdsF1jvbU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <BwPr9QV6owI31onnMoCB7d00cXg@jntp> <55e09d07-6cc0-4eaa-b510-a8f665b75ae2n@googlegroups.com> <tmvnbm$16ko3$1@dont-email.me> <tn07rb$1ash4$1@dont-email.me> <tn099r$1b2aj$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/9/2022 3:28 PM, Hanoi Cuocco wrote:
> Trolidan7 wrote:
> 
>>>> Richard No ether means no ether properties, means no evidences. So,
> you
>>>> cannot disprove existence of ether. Failure to see does not imply no
>>>> existence.
>>>
>>> that's exactly what is implied, in physics. Fucking stoopid. You
>>> neither had your anus inside a physics laboratory. Are you gay?
>>
>> I am not sure if there were ever any clearly established
>> 'ether' properties.
>> If a word does not have meaning, then if you start attacking
>> a bogeybear without meaning, then you might be attacking something
>> true in the name of some horrible bogeybear.
>> But if it doesn't have clear meaning, then you never really know.
>> If you call 'ether' 'spacetime' and 'spacetime' 'ether', does
>> that mean that 'relativity' is not true because some of it
>> is based upon 'spacetime' and not 'ether'?
> 
> you mix words together. In physics something not seen/detected or properly
> derived, it does NOT exists. Immaterial. Which is another domain.
> Different from science. Here's some proofs:
> 
> Russian TV Mocks America for Chosing a Black Lesbian Drug Addict Over
> Decorated Hero & Spy
> https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/FV0HU7izChGi

Still with the gay thing that has nothing to do with the physics
discussion at hand.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? "sepp623@yahoo.com" <sepp623@yahoo.com> - 2022-12-07 06:25 -0800
  Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-07 12:33 -0800
    Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? "sepp623@yahoo.com" <sepp623@yahoo.com> - 2022-12-07 15:58 -0800
      Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Trevor Lange <trevorlange97@gmail.com> - 2022-12-07 16:36 -0800
  Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-12-08 10:28 +0100
    Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-12-08 14:26 +0000
      Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 02:15 -0800
        Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-12-09 13:19 +0100
        Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-12-09 13:59 +0000
          Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 07:29 -0800
          Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 07:32 -0800
            Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-12-09 15:41 +0000
              Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 08:19 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Hanoi Cuocco <ouco@ocaoch.ho> - 2022-12-09 16:22 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Trolidan7 <Trolidan7@eternal-september.org> - 2022-12-09 13:03 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Hanoi Cuocco <ouco@ocaoch.ho> - 2022-12-09 21:28 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-09 16:16 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Hanoi Cuocco <ouco@ocaoch.ho> - 2022-12-10 00:27 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-09 21:45 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-10 02:16 -0500
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-10 10:08 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Lou  Abatangelo <lbta@autala.nl> - 2022-12-10 20:17 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-10 16:14 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 20:53 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-10 04:54 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-10 10:57 -0500
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-10 13:35 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-12-10 04:03 +0100
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-10 04:57 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Aether Regaind <AetherRegaind@invalid.com> - 2022-12-17 19:02 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemoveandReplaceATkevinaylward.co.uk> - 2022-12-18 13:51 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-12-18 21:10 +0100
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 14:51 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Aether Regaind <AetherRegaind@invalid.com> - 2022-12-19 19:49 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-19 15:17 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-19 16:07 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 23:50 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemoveandReplaceATkevinaylward.co.uk> - 2022-12-22 09:12 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-22 12:21 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 11:23 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 09:20 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 10:35 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:04 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:19 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-24 14:00 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemoveandReplaceATkevinaylward.co.uk> - 2022-12-29 08:01 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 00:28 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-29 11:30 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 10:58 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-29 13:08 -0600
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 21:41 -0800
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-12-20 22:46 +0100
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-12-20 22:28 +0100
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Vincenzo Longo <olcv@ovgingln.og> - 2022-12-20 23:57 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-12-09 16:34 +0000
                Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 09:17 -0800
        Crank John-Erik Persson chimes in "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 07:45 -0800
          Re: Crank John-Erik Persson chimes in John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 08:22 -0800
            Re: Crank John-Erik Persson chimes in "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 08:38 -0800
              Re: Crank John-Erik Persson chimes in John-Erik Persson <john.erik.persson@gmail.com> - 2022-12-09 09:17 -0800
        Re: "Physics" of Time Dilation - contradiction? Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-12-10 07:52 -0800

csiph-web