Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #596931

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained
Date 2022-12-07 09:12 +0100
Message-ID <jvb06cF9bqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (18 earlier) <b1c8b485-d958-4d1d-bd02-d5248c6ecd4an@googlegroups.com> <jv5m7hF5u8eU1@mid.individual.net> <tmldjs$k4h$1@dont-email.me> <jv8bklFidloU1@mid.individual.net> <jv9hscFo2ngU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am 06.12.2022 um 20:01 schrieb whodat:
> On 12/6/2022 2:08 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 05.12.2022 um 19:34 schrieb Dallas Basurto:
>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>> Am 02.12.2022 um 12:17 schrieb JanPB:
>>>>>>>> Infinity is not a location, hence nothing can be placed there.
>>>>
>>>> A place far away is not infinitity!
>>>> A place far away is a real place, but in some distance.
>>>> We only know from the context, that Einstein wanted the source so far
>>>> away, that plane wave approximations are possible in vicinitity of the
>>>> center of the coordinate system.
>>>
>>> let him pack his shit and move to america. These uneducated, unskilled
>>> dicks, wants make us believe they landed man on moon 1969.
>>>
>>> Endless Fail: World's Biggest Joke F-35 Has Another Disaster
>>> https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/bNJIRyMgKtpp
>>>
>>
>> German military is apparently forced to buy these planes to replace
>> 'Tornados'.
>>
>> I woukd say, that
>>
>> https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/what-went-wrong-with-the-f-35-fighter-jet/
>>
>>
>> "The most expensive fighter jet in history is also one of the least
>> reliable.
>>
>> Earlier this year, the U.S. Air Force tacitly admitted that the F-35
>> fighter jet was a failure. A very expensive, time-consuming failure.
>>
>> The F-35 was supposed to be a low-cost, lightweight fighter jet. But
>> with a cost of around $100 million per jet and project delays now
>> stretching into double digits, the F-35 is one of the most
>> high-profile failures in the history of military procurement. What
>> happened, and what does the future hold for the F-35 fighter jet?"
>>
>> isn't really a recommendendation.
>
> The Lockheed Electra is a very good counterexample.
>
A better example was the 'Starfighter'.

I knew actually two ladies personally, who had a father, who died in a 
'Starfighter'.

So, from time to time, the US military is able to dump their 
'Starfighters' in Germany.

I don't know the exact mechanism, of course, but would say, that it is 
not entirely beneficial (for Germany).



TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-11-30 09:19 +0100
  Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-30 16:12 +0000
  Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 20:15 -0800
    Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-01 10:46 +0100
      Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 12:40 -0800
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 13:15 -0800
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-02 08:22 +0100
          Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 03:17 -0800
            Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-05 08:51 +0100
              Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 03:03 -0800
              Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Dallas Basurto <aarr@maramr.sa> - 2022-12-05 18:34 +0000
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-06 09:08 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-06 13:01 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-07 09:12 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-07 12:31 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-08 08:06 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-08 10:17 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-09 07:54 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-09 10:56 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-10 07:53 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-10 06:53 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-10 10:06 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-11 07:48 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-07 11:23 -0800
      Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-02 01:25 -0500

csiph-web