Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #596952

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/7/2022 2:12 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 06.12.2022 um 20:01 schrieb whodat:
>> On 12/6/2022 2:08 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>> Am 05.12.2022 um 19:34 schrieb Dallas Basurto:
>>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>> Am 02.12.2022 um 12:17 schrieb JanPB:
>>>>>>>>> Infinity is not a location, hence nothing can be placed there.
>>>>>
>>>>> A place far away is not infinitity!
>>>>> A place far away is a real place, but in some distance.
>>>>> We only know from the context, that Einstein wanted the source so far
>>>>> away, that plane wave approximations are possible in vicinitity of the
>>>>> center of the coordinate system.
>>>>
>>>> let him pack his shit and move to america. These uneducated, unskilled
>>>> dicks, wants make us believe they landed man on moon 1969.
>>>>
>>>> Endless Fail： World's Biggest Joke F-35 Has Another Disaster
>>>> https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/bNJIRyMgKtpp
>>>>
>>>
>>> German military is apparently forced to buy these planes to replace
>>> 'Tornados'.
>>>
>>> I woukd say, that
>>>
>>> https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/what-went-wrong-with-the-f-35-fighter-jet/
>>>
>>>
>>> "The most expensive fighter jet in history is also one of the least
>>> reliable.
>>>
>>> Earlier this year, the U.S. Air Force tacitly admitted that the F-35
>>> fighter jet was a failure. A very expensive, time-consuming failure.
>>>
>>> The F-35 was supposed to be a low-cost, lightweight fighter jet. But
>>> with a cost of around $100 million per jet and project delays now
>>> stretching into double digits, the F-35 is one of the most
>>> high-profile failures in the history of military procurement. What
>>> happened, and what does the future hold for the F-35 fighter jet?"
>>>
>>> isn't really a recommendendation.
>>
>> The Lockheed Electra is a very good counterexample.
>>
> A better example was the 'Starfighter'.
> 
> I knew actually two ladies personally, who had a father, who died in a 
> 'Starfighter'.
> 
> So, from time to time, the US military is able to dump their 
> 'Starfighters' in Germany.
> 
> I don't know the exact mechanism, of course, but would say, that it is 
> not entirely beneficial (for Germany).

Lockheed was corrupt where the F-104 sales were concerned. Still, you
purposely missed the point I made, that even severe flaws can (and
sometimes are) corrected yielding a well functioning piece of
technology. You prefer to substitute politics for the realities. I can't
say I'm surprised. Do you feel any better for it? If you do, why?

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-11-30 09:19 +0100
  Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-30 16:12 +0000
  Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 20:15 -0800
    Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-01 10:46 +0100
      Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 12:40 -0800
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 13:15 -0800
        Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-02 08:22 +0100
          Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 03:17 -0800
            Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-05 08:51 +0100
              Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-12-05 03:03 -0800
              Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Dallas Basurto <aarr@maramr.sa> - 2022-12-05 18:34 +0000
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-06 09:08 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-06 13:01 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-07 09:12 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-07 12:31 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-08 08:06 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-08 10:17 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-09 07:54 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-09 10:56 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-10 07:53 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-10 06:53 -0800
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-10 10:06 -0600
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-11 07:48 +0100
                Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-07 11:23 -0800
      Re: The error of relativistic physicists explained Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-02 01:25 -0500

csiph-web