Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268510
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Global Warming is not real science |
| Date | 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000 |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <hgnv9.e@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <04dd86f6-9f33-4b9d-84a4-a7b2e07478c9@googlegroups.com> <h2gue0a3f.gph@rooftop.invalid> <D096B0ED.419D0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <gbcve9r.jge@rooftop.invalid> <D096B50D.419D5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/22/14, 9:39 PM, in article gbcve9r.jge@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > ... >>>>> Some people are as stupid as the left wing politicians need them to be. >>>> >>>> Global Warming/Climate Change is definitely a scam, but couldn't you find >>>> a better reference than some guy hawking his newsletter? >> >>> I would love to see your best evidence that the mass of science, from many >>> disciplines and sources, and being fought by some of the biggest sources of >>> money on the planet, is a "scam". >> >> Many disciplines? Why? > And that is your "best evidence" - to question why scientists from many > disciplines have looked into something as important and well supported as > global climate change... in other words you have nothing. > OK: so you have no evidence at all to back your claim of a scam. I can > accept that. Being a "scientist" does not make one an expert, or even a "scientist," in fields outside his area of study. For instance, while I might consider a medical doctor to be something akin to a scientist, I would give exactly zero credibility to his opinion on the question of "climate change." But anyway... http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136 <quote> The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change. Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make. ... Of the various petitions on global warming circulated for signatures by scientists, the one by the Petition Project, a group of physicists and physical chemists based in La Jolla, Calif., has by far the most signatures—more than 31,000 (more than 9,000 with a Ph.D.). It was most recently published in 2009, and most signers were added or reaffirmed since 2007. The petition states that "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of . . . carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate." </quote> http://www.petitionproject.org/ >>>> <quote> >>>> That's a Total Velue of $180 . . . in Return for Your $5 Contribution Today. >>>> ... >>>> >>>> To be clear, the minimum contribution when you join the Cold Truth >>>> Initiative is $5. But you are allowed to contribute more . . . >>>> </quote> >>>> >>>> It is interesting though that on this issue you decide *not* to rely on >>>> the same appeal-to-authority fallacy that you use to deny the Sandy Hook >>>> hoax. >> >>> The biggest predictor of belief in one unsupportable conspiracy theory is >>> the belief in another. >> >> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. > Another claim for which you have no evidence. You have insults... all you > can do. You want evidence? Ask anybody who's ever met a psychology kook.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700
csiph-web