Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268505

Re: Global Warming is not real science

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Global Warming is not real science
Date	2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
Organization	ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID	<h2gue0a3f.gph@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	<04dd86f6-9f33-4b9d-84a4-a7b2e07478c9@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.moneynews.com/mkt-news/Scientist-Confesses-Global-Warming-a-$22-B/2014/11/17/id/607827/?snit-falls-for-every-liberal-scam

> One leading scientist -- Kevin Trenberth -- admitted "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we can't." A travesty simply because they were worried about losing their government funding.

> In another email, Dr. Phil Jones -- a leading "global warming" advocate at the United Nations -- admitted that he used "Mike's Nature trick" in a 1999 graph to "hide the decline" in temperature.

> And another study done by Stephen Goddard at Real Science revealed just how ridiculous "climate scientists" can get with data manipulation. Here is what he had to say: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been "adjusting" its record by replacing real temperatures with data "fabricated" by computer models."

> Some people are as stupid as the left wing politicians need them to be.

Global Warming/Climate Change is definitely a scam, but couldn't you find
a better reference than some guy hawking his newsletter?

<quote>
That's a Total Velue of $180 . . . in Return for Your $5 Contribution Today.
...
To be clear, the minimum contribution when you join the Cold Truth
Initiative is $5. But you are allowed to contribute more . . .
</quote>

It is interesting though that on this issue you decide *not* to rely on 
the same appeal-to-authority fallacy that you use to deny the Sandy Hook
hoax.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
  Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
      Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
      Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700

csiph-web