Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs)

Subject	Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs)
Newsgroups	comp.theory
References	(17 earlier) <87blimia3f.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <IeudnWKKBbfaM8zCnZ2dnUU7-YnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <87o8mmgp9v.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <58KdnSqHk5kqWMzCnZ2dnUU7-eHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <87d031hl72.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
From	olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com>
Date	2020-09-04 08:41 -0500
Message-ID	<bZadnZdPBOeC2c_CnZ2dnUU7-UfNnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/4/2020 5:48 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
> 
>> On 9/3/2020 11:05 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 9/3/2020 8:50 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I now have the every single detailed design of an x86 virtual machine
>>>>>> that matches the self-referential aspect of the H_Hat template (and
>>>>>> all of the conventional HP proofs) such that this virtual machine
>>>>>> correctly decides halting on itself and this computation is equivalent
>>>>>> to a Turing machine computation.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are going backwards.  20 months after having every detail fully
>>>>> encoded as actual Turing machines, you now only have a design.  At this
>>>>> rate, in another 20 months, you will have a blank piece of paper.
>>>>>
>>>>> And you don't have to show Turing completeness or equivalence.  All of
>>>>> that is a red herring
>>>>
>>>> No it was proactively eliminating the basis for rejection.
>>>> I wanted to eliminate the possibility that I would have to spent
>>>> another two years convincing people that my works applies to Turing
>>>> Machines.
>>>
>>> In fact you adding opportunities for rejection because you are not doing
>>> a sound job of showing the equivalence you want.
>>
>> I know that I did a complete job of defining Turing equivalent
>> computations.
> 
> More wasted effort.  These are a well-understood concepts.  But it's

I needed to be sure by working through the reasoning myself. Most of the 
people that I spoke with agreed that there is such a thing as Turing 
equivilent machines yet disagreed that there could be such a thing as 
Turing equivalent computations. Without Turing equivalent computations 
we had no way of knowing whether or not concrete machines and abstract 
machines would derive equivalent outout on equlvalent input and have 
identical halting behavior.

> also beside the point.  Anything to do with equivalence is just a
> time-wasting ruse because a P that gets P(<[P^], [P^]>) right is just as
> significant in any model.  And that, of course, is the only thing you
> haven't posted.
> 

> You keep wanting to know what the basis would be for world to accept
> that you are right.  

I provided a basis that I am certain is correct and you incorrectly 
disagreed that it is correct thus proving that you would not give my 
work a fair review.

> It is simply that: a P that gets P(<[P^], [P^]>)
> right.  Not any of the traces, or UTMs, or virtual machines on which you
> are wasting your time, 

So it it gets it right through a quadrillion five-tuple steps where no 
one can possibly see the details of how it gets it right people will 
naturally take my word when I say that it gets it right?

> just the program or code P that behaves as you
> claim.  And it does not matter language it uses.  The result is the same
> in sub-Turing complete languages and Turing complete ones.  You can even
> use an oracle machine that can do hyper-computations, and still a P that
> gets P(<[P^], [P^]>) right is worth posting.
> 

In complexity theory and computability theory, an oracle machine is an 
abstract machine used to study decision problems. It can be visualized 
as a Turing machine with a black box, called an oracle, which is able to 
solve certain decision problems in a single operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_machine

OK great so everyone will accept a black box machine that simply returns 
a Boolean, all that I have to do is assert that the Boolean value is the 
correct value and there won't be on person on Earth that does not simply 
believe me.

> The truth is, though, that such a thing does not exist in any model.  No
> x86 code, C program, Turing machine or even an imaginary oracle machine
> can halt with the right answer in that one case.  Every other input is

Since an Oracle machine is a black box how would you know the answer is 
not right?

> unimportant.  P(s) can do what it likes when s is not <[P^], [P^]>.  It
> does not even have to gave an answer of any sort (it need not even
> finish) in those cases.  Only the one result, P(<[P^], [P^]>), matters
> because of the way P^ is constructed from P.
> 
>> Maybe you are not aware of this because you only skim what I say
>> looking for any basis of denigration?
> 
> There is a lot to denigrate in your posts.  The years of unsubstantiated
> boasts.  The big lie about having it all worked out as Turing machines
> 20 months ago.  Endless wasted posts on side issues to avoid having to
> post the key missing program.
> 

When I asked you to show that you are not biased against by showing the 
number of times that you said I was right about something you had to go 
back to 2016. It is commonly know that bias is systemtatic error.

>  From the outside it looks like you had a bad episode when your dog died
> and you made a grandiose claim based on a fragment of an idea.  Ever
> since then you've been fighting tooth and nail to avoid having to post
> the code, because you have never had it what you claimed.  All the

We need to refine the criteria that you have provided in this post.
What you have provided is an excellent frame work for a criterion 
measure of sufficiency.

> "execution traces", "virtual machines" and "UTMs" are just things you've
> picked on as reasons to delay the inevitable -- admitting the fact you
> don't have the program you claimed.

When I explain all of the details of why this assessment is inaccurate 
you dismiss it out-of-hand entirely on the basis that you simlpy do not 
believe what I say. That is a wise (yet dishonest) strategy for someone 
that only wants to denigrate and never wants to accurately critique.

> 
> I am, you may be surprised to hear, sympathetic to your case.  I think
> your life is (or was) unravelling, and being right out this was the only
> thing you had to hold on to.  But your arrogant and bombastic tone when

Is an ad hominem thus logically incorrect basis for any accurate 
assessment of my work.

> posting makes it very hard to express sympathy without appearing to be
> patronising.  The truth is that the kindest replies from everyone would
> be none at all.  Enabling your delusions is not doing you any favours.
> 
> You need another way to occupy your time.  Rescue a dog from the pound.
> Go for long walks.  I've been volunteering as a dog training instructor
> in my retirement and I have to say it's probably more fulfilling than
> teaching B23 - Models of Computation to CS undergraduates.
> 

Ultimately your above post seems disingenuous. My key basis for 
assessing this as disingenuous is that you said there is no need for an 
execution trace to see how H_Hat correctly decides halting on itself and 
that an Oracle machine (thus black box) would be good enough.

-- 
Copyright 2020 Pete Olcott

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-14 17:54 -0500
  Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 01:05 +0100
    Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 00:29 -0500
      Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 20:22 +0100
        Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 16:06 -0500
          Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-15 22:59 +0100
            Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 17:45 -0500
              Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 02:36 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-15 21:07 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 13:23 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 10:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 17:41 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 12:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 20:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 14:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 20:52 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V40 (x86 is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 15:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V40 (x86 is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 22:23 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 16:44 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-17 00:07 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 18:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-17 00:44 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 10:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-17 09:35 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 12:16 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-17 10:53 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 13:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-17 12:19 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 16:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-17 18:12 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 13:43 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 16:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 00:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 16:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 14:49 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 17:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 17:08 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 20:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 20:47 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 23:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 22:47 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 01:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 00:30 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 10:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-24 11:40 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 13:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-24 13:23 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 16:02 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-24 20:30 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 09:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 08:56 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 10:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 09:59 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 12:00 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 12:39 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] ROOKIE MISTAKE olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 14:37 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V42 [x86 is Turing complete] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-17 20:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-16 16:01 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-16 18:13 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-20 19:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 00:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-21 11:20 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 09:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-21 12:17 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 13:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-21 14:14 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 16:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (x86 Turing is complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 01:10 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 19:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 03:06 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 21:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-21 19:47 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 22:00 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-21 20:12 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 22:22 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-21 22:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 11:28 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 10:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 22:24 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 17:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-22 23:36 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 18:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 02:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 22:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 00:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 13:00 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 08:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 16:42 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 11:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 22:14 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 16:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-24 01:38 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 21:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 21:22 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 23:54 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 00:05 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 18:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 01:59 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 20:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-24 21:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 03:54 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 01:38 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 03:37 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 09:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 08:34 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 11:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 10:28 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 12:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-25 12:30 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 13:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 12:50 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 15:14 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 12:29 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 14:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 12:54 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 15:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 13:38 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 16:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-25 23:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 18:01 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-25 17:07 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 20:07 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 16:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 15:40 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 18:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 17:31 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 19:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 03:37 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 22:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 12:58 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 09:38 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 17:36 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 12:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 20:43 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 15:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 22:40 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2020-08-26 18:28 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 12:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 19:41 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 14:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 21:17 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 15:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-26 22:37 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 16:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 15:41 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 18:15 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-26 17:32 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 19:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (Chris Rock Speaks for God) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-26 20:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 10:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 10:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 10:25 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 09:39 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 11:25 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 10:42 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 11:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 11:45 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-28 17:52 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 12:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 11:19 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-28 12:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-28 22:34 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 03:06 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 08:27 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-29 07:44 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 09:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-29 08:58 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 10:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-30 07:38 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Turing Equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 11:11 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 10:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 17:47 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 12:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 14:01 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 20:03 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 14:48 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 21:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 16:00 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 23:32 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 18:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 02:24 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 21:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 23:15 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 22:57 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-29 22:13 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-08-29 23:27 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-30 03:27 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 16:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 23:53 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 18:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 02:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-29 21:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Can "C" be made Turing complete?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 15:38 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 11:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-30 20:05 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 14:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 14:37 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-30 13:10 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 15:19 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-08-30 14:22 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 16:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-31 02:48 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 02:08 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 09:49 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 13:59 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 16:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 15:24 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-31 19:26 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 21:37 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-31 23:56 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 23:10 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-01 02:28 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-09-01 02:02 +0000
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-01 03:16 +0100
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-09-01 02:29 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-31 08:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-01 00:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-02 09:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-02 12:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-03 06:12 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 09:46 -0500
                Re: Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) kegs@provalid.com (Kent Dickey) - 2020-09-03 14:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2020-09-03 21:28 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 16:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2020-09-03 23:20 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 17:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2020-09-04 01:56 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 20:15 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 20:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2020-09-04 02:47 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 21:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 03:52 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 22:15 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 22:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 05:14 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 23:37 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 15:28 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 16:16 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-03 16:13 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 12:05 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 02:50 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 22:02 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 05:05 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-03 23:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 11:48 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 08:41 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 17:04 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 11:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 22:29 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-09-04 14:42 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 22:53 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 17:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-05 02:25 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 20:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-05 23:58 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-09-05 17:59 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 20:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-04 22:50 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 00:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-05 09:49 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 09:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-05 11:03 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 11:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 10:40 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 12:12 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 11:42 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 13:17 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 12:33 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 14:16 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-05 16:19 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 15:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-05 17:19 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2020-09-05 23:01 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-09-05 17:52 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-05 21:12 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-06 02:32 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 13:08 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 21:49 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2020-09-06 04:35 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 22:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 22:58 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 08:47 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 11:42 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-06 11:43 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 13:04 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 16:07 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 15:14 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-06 21:42 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 16:16 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 14:18 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 13:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-06 12:59 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 14:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-06 13:37 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 14:44 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-06 14:02 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 15:22 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 17:02 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 16:22 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 18:19 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 17:39 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 20:23 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 20:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 21:51 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 21:10 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-07 00:59 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 21:02 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-09-06 22:51 -0400
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-06 22:10 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 15:29 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 15:52 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-06 00:05 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 15:28 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-05 23:09 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 00:40 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-06 02:25 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-04 22:45 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 00:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 00:03 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 09:20 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 09:34 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 11:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-09-05 10:48 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-05 12:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-05 23:18 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 12:47 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 08:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-04 17:11 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 11:39 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2020-09-03 22:44 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2020-09-04 11:09 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (HP refutation Sufficiency Specs) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-04 13:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 00:23 +0100
                Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 19:17 -0500
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2020-08-31 09:59 +0100
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-31 08:47 -0500
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-02 09:58 -0500
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-09-03 03:37 +0100
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-02 21:50 -0500
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-02 22:04 -0500
                Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 007 [Mapping x86 to Turing Equivalent] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-09-02 22:30 -0500
                Re: Simply defining G"odel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2020-08-31 02:16 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V52 (Machine equivalence) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-08-30 20:43 -0400
                Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing unlimited memory access to C] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 20:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-08-30 07:27 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V51 (Making "C" Turing equivalent) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-30 10:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 01:24 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V50 (Making "C" Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-25 14:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 10:18 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 17:51 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 12:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-23 22:12 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V47 (x86 really is Turing complete) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-23 16:23 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V37 (Turing complete) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 16:19 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (Honest dialogue?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 18:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (Honest dialogue?) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 17:55 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V46 (Honest dialogue?) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-08-22 20:14 -0500

csiph-web