Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15225

Re: Single Class Object Model - new release

From Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Single Class Object Model - new release
Date 2012-06-12 18:24 +0200
Message-ID <a3p8r1Fbm1U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <a3d640da-835c-4aa3-bbce-3fb447e832cb@b1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <9562a637-4191-42c2-a4b2-a2db589cd820@googlegroups.com> <787f166d-488f-49fe-aa1f-bd8e227ed30e@eh4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <lcadnWBpeIcAPEvSnZ2dnUVZ8gydnZ2d@giganews.com> <169b14d7-e43d-482d-a195-bcd20965331a@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12.06.2012 06:42, micha wrote:

> BUT nevertheless Java has an unsurpassed firepower with tons of
> libraries, frameworks and dialects,

But you don't want to use them because you just want to have a single 
class, do you?

> AND SCOM is not only about levererage of functional programming but
> also:
> - about Adaptative Object Model (which is also already native but more
> in Smalltalk than in Lisp as Common Lisp is not an Object language
> from the start but requires an extension layer (CLOS) to support
> Object paradigm)
> - and about Semantic Web paradigm, starting with semantic networks
> described as triples by RDF/Owl:SCOM provides a simple and
>    straightforward mechanism (addfacet() method)  to build such 'triple
> based' semantic networks at runtime (like DOM is the runtime
>    data structure counterpart of an XML file)
>
> NOW there is Scala which is both functional and Object BUT not a
> purely interpreted metalanguage like Lisp (Lisp allows to define new
> Languages with it's bootstrapping/dynamic syntax capabilities)
>
> SO SCOM is not an attempt to do better than breakthrough languages
> like Scala, it's only an attempt to show that within Java microcosm,
> there's still ways to leverage expressiveness by adopting new
> paradigms namely Adaptative Object Model, Semantic Web inspired
> runtime data structures (not by extending Java with tons of new
> features which address implementation needs without really adding
> expressiveness or in the best case clearing out some inconsistencies,
> like int vs Integer, [] vs ArrayList etc...)

I still did not get what the purpose of this exercise is.  Why do you do 
this?  To what end?

Cheers

	robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Single Class Object Model - new release micha <kernmichel@yahoo.fr> - 2012-06-11 15:45 -0700
  Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 16:38 -0700
    Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 18:39 -0700
      Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-11 20:55 -0500
        Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 21:42 -0700
          Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 18:24 +0200
            Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 13:09 -0700
              Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 23:48 +0200
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 01:12 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-13 06:44 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 15:22 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-14 00:56 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-14 03:24 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-14 12:27 -0500
          Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 10:05 -0700
            Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 13:03 -0700
              Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-12 15:58 -0500
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 02:08 -0700
              Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 23:33 +0200
              Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-12 15:15 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 02:57 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-13 08:26 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 15:17 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-06-13 19:06 -0700
                Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-13 19:15 -0700

csiph-web