Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15231
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Single Class Object Model - new release |
| Date | 2012-06-12 23:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <a3prqfF42hU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <787f166d-488f-49fe-aa1f-bd8e227ed30e@eh4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <lcadnWBpeIcAPEvSnZ2dnUVZ8gydnZ2d@giganews.com> <169b14d7-e43d-482d-a195-bcd20965331a@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> <a3p8r1Fbm1U2@mid.individual.net> <0664fdd5-d018-46ef-912f-26c806b7b326@p27g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> |
Please truncate quotes properly. On 12.06.2012 22:09, micha wrote: > - The purpose is to show to Java programmer's that: > 1. there are alternate Object Model paradigms, especially Adaptative > Object Model (where classes are defined and extensible at runtime) OK, no surprise here. > 2. That the API may be outside of the class and instead in the > semantic network of agnostic instances (which is the purpose of It > class in SCOM) > SCOM allows easy creation of a semantic networl of its own > instances at runtime, and it is this network which becomes the API, > the It class > API is just an enabler (like machine code vs programming > language) I look at https://github.com/terimakasi/scom/blob/717f9b9e6748656b5bfcf439147e04b6293b8544/samples/arithmetic/Test_Add.java Here you created a graph of objects which contain functionality in a similar way a interpreter could use internally. Instead of invoking a method "add" on an instance of a numeric class you have a generic method "evaluate" - and that obviously behaves different for something that was created in a special way (with arguments ItAddF.BASENAME, ItAddF.BASENAME, ItAddF.CLASS_NAME). Basically you replaced specific methods with specific instances which behave differently. No surprises here as well - that's a common idiom if you want to stick together algorithms at runtime. Now that you've shown it, why should I care? Put differently: what can I do better with this than with - say - plain Java? Apparently you are trying to sell something but I fail to see the benefit or why you post it in a Java newsgroup. Cheers robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Single Class Object Model - new release micha <kernmichel@yahoo.fr> - 2012-06-11 15:45 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 16:38 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 18:39 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-11 20:55 -0500
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 21:42 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 18:24 +0200
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 13:09 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 23:48 +0200
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 01:12 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-13 06:44 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 15:22 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-14 00:56 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-14 03:24 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-14 12:27 -0500
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 10:05 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 13:03 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-12 15:58 -0500
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 02:08 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 23:33 +0200
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 02:57 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-13 08:26 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 15:17 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-06-13 19:06 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-13 19:15 -0700
csiph-web