Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15245
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Single Class Object Model - new release |
| Date | 2012-06-13 08:26 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jrabfe$6c6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <169b14d7-e43d-482d-a195-bcd20965331a@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> <b65de1ac-27ff-4b67-ab57-ed0e83a18766@googlegroups.com> <0527b567-b7b6-4f79-b675-08993ba77b88@x21g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <jr8f1j$6ne$1@dont-email.me> <a70e4fe9-7e36-4ed2-8dd8-c3045a34a05d@eh4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
On 6/13/2012 2:57 AM, micha wrote: > a reaction against 'deep ultimate class > hierarchies' that I've seen promoted proudly by SW developers/ > architects. See, this is where I think you're handing us a line of bullshit. NO ONE is promoting anything other than the kind of strongly type libraries that Java uses. There is no reaction against "deep ultimate" class libraries. Your project has no reason to exist because your premise is deeply flawed. Now if you'd like to show me this reaction by "developers," which has until now escaped my notice, fine; I'll take a look. But my honest opinion right now is that you're just some kind of kook.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Single Class Object Model - new release micha <kernmichel@yahoo.fr> - 2012-06-11 15:45 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 16:38 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 18:39 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-11 20:55 -0500
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-11 21:42 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 18:24 +0200
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 13:09 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 23:48 +0200
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 01:12 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-13 06:44 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 15:22 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-14 00:56 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-14 03:24 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-14 12:27 -0500
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 10:05 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 13:03 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-12 15:58 -0500
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 02:08 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 23:33 +0200
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 02:57 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-13 08:26 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release micha <ludicite@gmail.com> - 2012-06-13 15:17 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-06-13 19:06 -0700
Re: Single Class Object Model - new release markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-13 19:15 -0700
csiph-web