Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50

From	ken <ken@spamcop.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.postscript
Subject	Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50
Date	2020-06-05 15:28 +0100
Message-ID	<MPG.394466f4ba1a97e59898b5@usenet.plus.net> (permalink)
References	<rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net> <MPG.394436f6422b70c99898b3@usenet.plus.net> <rbdeqr$m4s$1@adenine.netfront.net>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <rbdeqr$m4s$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says...
> 
> On 2020/6/5 19:04, ken wrote:
> > In article <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says...
> >   
> >> Any help?
> > 
> > Wihtout seeing the PostScript file ? No I can't really say there's any
> > likely way to help.
> > 
> 
> well, I have located the problem. It triggered by a EPS file. After run 
> eps2eps on the EPS, now ghostscript 9.51 does not give any error message.
> 
> I just wonder if it's a bug of ghostscript? After all, 9.50 could live 
> with the file, and 9.51 could not.

Again, without seeing the file, there's no possible way to tell. It 
could equally well be that there was something wrong which was 
previously ignored, and now is not.


Ken

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 18:40 +0800
  Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 12:04 +0100
    Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 19:47 +0800
      Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 13:09 +0100
    Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 20:46 +0800
      Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 15:28 +0100
        Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2020-06-05 18:41 +0200
          Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 18:31 +0100
        Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-06 09:06 +0800

csiph-web