Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3537
| From | ken <ken@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 |
| Date | 2020-06-05 13:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3944464b81304a199898b4@usenet.plus.net> (permalink) |
| References | <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net> <MPG.394436f6422b70c99898b3@usenet.plus.net> <rbdbcm$f5n$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
In article <rbdbcm$f5n$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says... > > On 2020/6/5 19:04, ken wrote: > > In article <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says... > > > >> Any help? > > > > Wihtout seeing the PostScript file ? No I can't really say there's any > > likely way to help. > > I don't know how to prepare a minimal work example. I run the above > command with my thesis with size larger than 30 MB. Well, Ghostscript will pause between pages if you don't specify - dNOPAUSE, and often will display which page its processing anyway. So you should be able to work out which page is causing the problem. You could then try printing just that page to PostScript, or at least all the pages up to and including that page if hte one page on its own doesn't cause a problem. If all else fails you can supply the entire file, 30MB isn't that large. > > Ghostscript 9.51 was superseded one week later by Ghostscript 9.52, > > although the differences were minor I'd suggest you should be using that > > rather than 9.51. > > I also run the same command with 9.52. The same error message. I can't say I'm hugely surprised, it 'looks like' there's a problem with the PostScript, though as I say, without seeing the PostScript contents I can't really be sure. Ken
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 18:40 +0800
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 12:04 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 19:47 +0800
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 13:09 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 20:46 +0800
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 15:28 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2020-06-05 18:41 +0200
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 18:31 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-06 09:06 +0800
csiph-web