Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3537

Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50

From ken <ken@spamcop.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
Subject Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50
Date 2020-06-05 13:09 +0100
Message-ID <MPG.3944464b81304a199898b4@usenet.plus.net> (permalink)
References <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net> <MPG.394436f6422b70c99898b3@usenet.plus.net> <rbdbcm$f5n$1@adenine.netfront.net>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <rbdbcm$f5n$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says...
> 
> On 2020/6/5 19:04, ken wrote:
> > In article <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says...
> >   
> >> Any help?
> > 
> > Wihtout seeing the PostScript file ? No I can't really say there's any
> > likely way to help.
> 
> I don't know how to prepare a minimal work example. I run the above 
> command with my thesis with size larger than 30 MB.

Well, Ghostscript will pause between pages if you don't specify -
dNOPAUSE, and often will display which page its processing anyway. So 
you should be able to work out which page is causing the problem. You 
could then try printing just that page to PostScript, or at least all 
the pages up to and including that page if hte one page on its own 
doesn't cause a problem.

If all else fails you can supply the entire file, 30MB isn't that large.


> > Ghostscript 9.51 was superseded one week later by Ghostscript 9.52,
> > although the differences were minor I'd suggest you should be using that
> > rather than 9.51.
> 
> I also run the same command with 9.52. The same error message.

I can't say I'm hugely surprised, it 'looks like' there's a problem with 
the PostScript, though as I say, without seeing the PostScript contents 
I can't really be sure.



		Ken

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 18:40 +0800
  Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 12:04 +0100
    Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 19:47 +0800
      Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 13:09 +0100
    Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 20:46 +0800
      Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 15:28 +0100
        Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2020-06-05 18:41 +0200
          Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 18:31 +0100
        Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-06 09:06 +0800

csiph-web