Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3538
| From | Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 |
| Date | 2020-06-05 20:46 +0800 |
| Organization | Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ |
| Message-ID | <rbdeqr$m4s$1@adenine.netfront.net> (permalink) |
| References | <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net> <MPG.394436f6422b70c99898b3@usenet.plus.net> |
On 2020/6/5 19:04, ken wrote: > In article <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says... > >> Any help? > > Wihtout seeing the PostScript file ? No I can't really say there's any > likely way to help. > well, I have located the problem. It triggered by a EPS file. After run eps2eps on the EPS, now ghostscript 9.51 does not give any error message. I just wonder if it's a bug of ghostscript? After all, 9.50 could live with the file, and 9.51 could not. > If you think you've found a bug my advice would be to report a bug at > https://bugs.ghostscript.com remember to attach the file that exhibits > the error and the command line. > > Ghostscript 9.51 was superseded one week later by Ghostscript 9.52, > although the differences were minor I'd suggest you should be using that > rather than 9.51. > > Regards, > > Ken Sharp > Best, Jinsong
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 18:40 +0800
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 12:04 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 19:47 +0800
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 13:09 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 20:46 +0800
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 15:28 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2020-06-05 18:41 +0200
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 18:31 +0100
Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-06 09:06 +0800
csiph-web