Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50

From	Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.postscript
Subject	Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50
Date	2020-06-06 09:06 +0800
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<rbeq6j$178d$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net> <MPG.394436f6422b70c99898b3@usenet.plus.net> <rbdeqr$m4s$1@adenine.netfront.net> <MPG.394466f4ba1a97e59898b5@usenet.plus.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2020/6/5 22:28, ken wrote:
> In article <rbdeqr$m4s$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says...
>>
>> On 2020/6/5 19:04, ken wrote:
>>> In article <rbd7eh$6d9$1@adenine.netfront.net>, jszhao@yeah.net says...
>>>    
>>>> Any help?
>>>
>>> Wihtout seeing the PostScript file ? No I can't really say there's any
>>> likely way to help.
>>>
>>
>> well, I have located the problem. It triggered by a EPS file. After run
>> eps2eps on the EPS, now ghostscript 9.51 does not give any error message.
>>
>> I just wonder if it's a bug of ghostscript? After all, 9.50 could live
>> with the file, and 9.51 could not.
> 
> Again, without seeing the file, there's no possible way to tell. It
> could equally well be that there was something wrong which was
> previously ignored, and now is not.
> 

I have submit a bug report:

https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702471

Best,
Jinsong

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 18:40 +0800
  Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 12:04 +0100
    Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 19:47 +0800
      Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 13:09 +0100
    Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-05 20:46 +0800
      Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 15:28 +0100
        Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2020-06-05 18:41 +0200
          Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-06-05 18:31 +0100
        Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Jinsong Zhao <jszhao@yeah.net> - 2020-06-06 09:06 +0800

csiph-web