Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #269216

Re: Global Warming is not real science

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Global Warming is not real science
Date 2014-11-26 12:56 -0700
Message-ID <D09B7E61.41DAC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <m50egk$3t4$3@dont-email.me> <628d263e-a393-4674-9d28-fc43e123e5dc@googlegroups.com> <m52322$eok$5@dont-email.me> <ghue0.3ar3@rooftop.invalid> <m5562l$gsc$6@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/26/14, 11:27 AM, in article m5562l$gsc$6@dont-email.me, "Slimer"
<slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:

> On 25/11/2014 8:16 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/24/2014 7:27 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On Monday, November 24, 2014 4:21:08 PM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hoaxer moron denials make me a little angry, but in the end you
>>>>> dumbasses have to live with yourselves and your stupid paranoia.
>>>> 
>>>> No point in being angry, people like owl, Slimer, etc., obviously have
>>>> brain chemistry issues.
>> 
>>> You have to be really weak-minded - a real lamebrain putz - to be a 9/11
>>> or Sandy Hook 'truther'.
>> 
>> I say Emilie Parker (far right) was photoshopped into this family photo:
>> 
>> http://jazztruther.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/hi-res-photoshopped1.jpeg
>> 
>> What do you think?
> 
> The EXIF data should let us know if you're right. It wouldn't be the
> first time that governments doctored images.

Can JPGs have EXIF data? :)
And doesn't downloading files, at least on OS X, add EXIF data? :)

The debate was back in 2008 and I am not going to even try to dig up the
ancient quotes, but when I noted JPG files could have EXIF data I was
repeatedly told I was wrong, lying, and idiot, etc. Funny stuff.



-- 
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
  Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
    Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
  Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
    Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 01:16 +0000
      Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 22:18 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 03:55 +0000
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:18 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:30 +0000
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:38 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 07:50 -0800
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:13 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:23 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:56 -0700
      Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:27 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:56 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 13:02 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 21:59 +0100
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 14:35 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 06:35 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 08:58 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 14:11 +0000
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 15:26 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 09:28 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-27 10:02 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:17 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 17:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 14:24 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:14 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:15 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 17:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:29 -0800
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:19 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:51 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:10 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 14:11 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 22:41 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 23:56 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:49 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:57 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:24 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 20:38 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:52 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 20:01 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 21:06 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-28 09:56 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:34 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-28 17:40 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:48 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 09:35 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-28 11:12 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 12:25 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 14:30 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-28 20:44 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 19:07 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 07:52 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-28 11:31 -0500
            Re: Global Warming is not real science chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-29 13:50 -0600
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-29 12:55 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-29 12:56 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 12:04 -0800
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 17:08 -0500
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 15:43 -0700

csiph-web