Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #269401
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Global Warming is not real science |
| Date | 2014-11-27 19:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D09D27CD.41EDC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <m57beq$k4q$1@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org> <m57c9s$o7c$1@dont-email.me> <D09C9BFD.41E33%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <f541c405-e5e5-49d0-b308-c51e2a5c37c3@googlegroups.com> <5477d4e3$0$46847$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> |
On 11/27/14, 6:50 PM, in article
5477d4e3$0$46847$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com, "vallor"
<vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> But you didn't do it here.
>>
>>> Peter Köhlmann: <http://goo.gl/FGoPA4>
>>> -----
>>> Does not matter. He already has shown his utter incompetence by
>>> sputtering about EXIF data which is not even present.
>>
>> What *specific* EXIF data would be the obvious question.
>>
>> Fact: This statement *can* have a different meaning than what you're trying
>> to suggest for it.
>>
>>> ----
>>> Peter Köhlmann: <http://goo.gl/I3nMDS>
>>> -----
>>> Yes, really. The EXIF data is one mouseclick away ...
>>
>> A thing that isn't necessarily contradictory with the statement above.
>> Context is the key here and being that you often munge it (purposefully, or
>> not) there's a high degree of probability you did so here. Right now the
>> gloves don't fit.
>>
>
> Looks like he took it out of context. It was obvious that Peter meant
> that EXIF data, in general, is a mouse click away on Linux -- but that
> presupposes the data actually exists in the images in question.
> Apparently, it didn't -- but mr. "I always admit when I'm wrong" will
> never admit that, because he thinks it will make him look too silly.
>
> (Well, too late for that.)
>
> It's more of what I said before: "snit" doesn't care what Peter meant,
> only what he can twist his words into meaning.
>
> Clearly if he's not being intentionally moronic, then he's
> delusional...he may actually believe that he's "right" in the way he
> quoted Peter out of context, when in fact, anyone with half a brain and
> any decent conversational charity will realize snitty-poo is full of hot
> air.
Look at the post and the thread... clearly the topic was the image being
discussed. In fact, if you look at the link I provide you can see the quote:
And of course you can use your great tech skills to post a screenshot
of said data?
This is not data in general, this is data for the file in question. And of
*that file* Peter says:
Yes, really. The EXIF data is one mouseclick away
But twist all you want. It is funny to see the herd protect the herd. The
same file Peter also denied had any EXIF data. But feel free to lie as much
as you want to defend your herd.
--
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 01:16 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 22:18 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 03:55 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:18 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:30 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:38 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 07:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:13 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:23 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:27 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 13:02 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 21:59 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 14:35 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 06:35 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 08:58 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 14:11 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 15:26 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 09:28 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-27 10:02 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:17 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 17:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 14:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:14 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:39 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:15 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 17:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:29 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:19 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:51 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:10 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 14:11 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 22:41 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 23:56 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:49 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 20:38 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:52 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 20:01 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 21:06 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-28 09:56 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:34 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-28 17:40 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:48 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 09:35 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-28 11:12 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 12:25 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 14:30 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-28 20:44 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 19:07 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 07:52 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-28 11:31 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-29 13:50 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-29 12:55 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-29 12:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 12:04 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-11-29 20:13 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 21:25 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 17:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 15:43 -0700
csiph-web