Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268579
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Global Warming is not real science |
| Date | 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D097AA63.41A37%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | <04dd86f6-9f33-4b9d-84a4-a7b2e07478c9@googlegroups.com> <h2gue0a3f.gph@rooftop.invalid> <D096B0ED.419D0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <gbcve9r.jge@rooftop.invalid> <m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me> |
On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: > > >> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. > > > The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as > demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. * 9/11 * Sandy Hook denail * Man walking on the moon hoax * Global warming denial * JFK's assassination * Chemtrails * AIDS being through vaccinations * Anti-vax fears * Exaggeration of GMO fears * Secret society of your choice running the world * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of these are amazing. > I do wonder how you morons pick and choose which events are "hoaxes". I > think your one and only criteria is whatever gets you the most attention > (which is the same way a 3rd grader chooses whether to pee or poop his > pants and tell everyone). What third grader does that? Ew. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 01:16 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:05 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:12 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:22 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:37 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:09 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 21:51 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700
csiph-web