Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172360
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! |
| Date | 2013-04-07 13:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CD871F17.18A95%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <CD81D7F7.186B3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ca146f20-6d5c-4147-ae94-5f3b9744f227@ps9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <kjsfe2$fq2$1@news.albasani.net> <CD87127B.18A7F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <028e280a-3f73-4bd7-a2f9-c48e5b213b13@v20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> |
On 4/7/13 12:26 PM, in article
028e280a-3f73-4bd7-a2f9-c48e5b213b13@v20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, "Mark S
Bilk" <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> wrote:
...
>> According to Bilk, though, the buildings merely
>> had air pressure - apparently everything else was
>> removed... secretly. But then the explosions turned the air
>> into steel girders, concrete, bodies, and much more.
>
> I never said any such thing. Snit is lying, as he does
> constantly.
From you, repeatedly:
-----
The force from the compressed air was far too small ...
-----
You repeatedly talk about the pressure from as if that was all that was in
the building. Are you now admitting your "compressed air" comments were
absurd? If not then why focus on air pressure when nobody else mentioned
it... and it is not relevant if you understand basic physics?
--
"Maybe it wouldn't be quite as good, but we would all be okay."
- Richard Stallman, speaking about if his ideas were followed
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 13:54 -0500
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:09 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 12:26 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:53 -0700
Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 13:03 -0700
Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 14:26 -0700
Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-07 17:48 -0400
Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:56 -0700
Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 15:02 -0700
Bilk makes it clear not even he believes his claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:50 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 17:33 -0500
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-08 00:48 +0200
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:25 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 19:13 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:38 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-07 22:34 -0400
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:47 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:24 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-08 13:08 -0400
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-08 13:37 -0700
Re: The Truth About 9/11 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 15:28 -0700
csiph-web