Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172387

Re: The Truth About 9/11

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/7/13 3:33 PM, in article kjss8i$8q2$1@news.albasani.net, "Nobody"
<invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

> On 4/7/2013 2:26 PM, Mark S Bilk wrote:
>> On Apr 7, 12:09 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/13 11:54 AM, "Nobody"wrote:
>>>> On 4/3/2013 3:20 PM, Mark S Bilk wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 3, 12:58 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>> [Mark Bilk] is the one who is not just confused but
>>>>>> just outright buying into complete and utter nonsense
>>>>>> conspiracy theories.
>>> 
>>>>> No.  I rely on evidence.  The video that shows a large
>>>>> number of girders being blown outward proves that
>>>>> explosives were planted in the towers.
>>> 
>>>> If girders were blown out sideways, it was due to the
>>>> impact and explosion of large airplanes crashing into the
>>>> towers and moving laterally in the path of their crash.
>>>> Also, a building that brought down by a plane crash can't
>>>> be expected to fall as a building does when brought down
>>>> by demolition experts, who cut strategic beams and place
>>>> sequenced charges.
>> 
>> The towers collapsed almost 1 hour and almost 2 hours,
>> respectively, after the planes hit them.  The impact of
>> the planes had nothing to do with girders being blown
>> outward at 70mph.
> 
> Other then knocking them over sideways before they got blown out by the
> collapse of the building?

The planes had *everything* to do with the towers collapsing. You know,
cause and effect. The fact it was not instantaneous does not change that
fact.

>>> According to Bilk, though, the buildings merely
>>> had air pressure - apparently everything else was
>>> removed... secretly. But then the explosions turned the air
>>> into steel girders, concrete, bodies, and much more.
>> 
>> I never said any such thing.  Snit is lying, as he does
>> constantly.
>> 
>>>>> The video that Chris Brown and others saw in 1990 proves
>>>>> that explosives were built into the massive concrete core
>>>>> of each tower when they were constructed, around 1969.
>> 
>>>> What reason would anybody have had to do such a thing in
>>>> 1969, let alone how they would have accomplished such a
>>>> thing in secret?  "Around 1969" would have been either at
>>>> the end of the Kennedy presidency, or the start of the
>>>> Nixon presidency, during the U.S. Viet Nam war, and the
>>>> Israeli War of Attrition.  Who then would think they needed
>>>> to fake an attack on the U.S. for an excuse to go to war?
>> 
>> As I've already said several times, the explosives were probably
>> implanted at the time of construction to make it easier to
>> demolish the buildings at the end of their useful life.
> 
> You really believe its common construction practice in the U.S. to build
> demolition explosives into the cores of new buildings?

Oh, not common... just in the "special" buildings. And then the government
holds on the video footage for 21 years and show it on PBS before hiding it.

You see, it all makes complete sense!

> Your own theories self implode.  If such a thing were real, it wouldn't
> be secret.  Somebody would have to pay for it.   Then there's the fact
> building codes, let alone common sense and just plain sanity wouldn't
> allow such a thing.

Of course not... Bilk is just insane.

-- 
"I mischaracterize things you say." - Brad cc Wiggins 

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 13:54 -0500
  Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:09 -0700
    Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 12:26 -0700
      Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:53 -0700
      Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 13:03 -0700
        Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 14:26 -0700
          Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-07 17:48 -0400
            Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:56 -0700
              Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 15:02 -0700
          Bilk makes it clear not even he believes his claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:50 -0700
      Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 17:33 -0500
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-08 00:48 +0200
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:25 -0700
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 19:13 -0700
              Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:38 -0700
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-07 22:34 -0400
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:47 -0700
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:24 -0700
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-08 13:08 -0400
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-08 13:37 -0700
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 15:28 -0700

csiph-web