Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172401

Re: The Truth About 9/11

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/7/13 7:13 PM, in article
34b089ad-f15a-4510-aead-67ada6b3d5bd@p5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, "Mark S
Bilk" <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> wrote:

> On Apr 7, 6:25 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/13 3:48 PM, "Peter Köhlmann" wrote:
> 
>> I, Snit, have done to him what I did to you - showed why his
>> claims and views are just insane. Pisses him off almost as
>> much as it pisses you off.
>> 
>> Love it!
> 
> This is the psychopath.  It doesn't want to learn anything.

Oh, I am learning how irrational and dishonest you are. And it is amusing
me. It is not like I expect better of you.

> It doesn't want to find out the truth.

I know the truth about your ignorance, dishonesty, and lack of understanding
of basic physics and other facts.
 
> All it wants is to make people unhappy.

No: I enjoy watching ignorant, lying, angry people such as yourself trip
over your own words and clearly become angry at yourself. And you are very,
very angry. It shows in your every post. All your own fault - I merely point
out why your BS is, well, utter BS.

> It loves that!

You keep saying you will not respond to me... but you do, but only with
insults and attacks.

In other words, by now even you know I have completely and fully refuted
your claims about 9-11.

* Bilk about videos taken and held for 21 years, then shown on a government
owned TV station only to be magically taken from *all* stations and
libraries and even people's homes is absurd.

* Bilk claims about welding highly flammable explosives is absurd - to the
point where he invented, on the fly, stories about copper clamps or wet
cloths (yes, really, wet cloths!) are just silly.

* Bilk claims of compressed air being what has been claimed by others as the
force that ejected tons of steel from the Twin Towers is bogus... something
Bilk fabricated. 

* Bilk has no evidence of some unknown force which would have prevented
steel from being ejected from the pancaking towers without the added force
of explosives.

* Bilk showed a massive lack of understanding of basic physics when he
claimed ejected material would not be seen falling at the same rate as other
materials.

* Bilk has not refuted the alternate and equally reasonable idea that the
buildings were brought down by Underground Marshmallow People.

* Bilk claims that to merely quote Stallman is to "attack" him make no
sense.

* Bilk claims that to quote him is to lie about is claims is dishonest.

* Bilks claims that I and others are paid to post to COLA is utter nonsense.

On and on... pretty much every one of Bilk's claims have been absurd,
dishonest, ignorant, or just beyond foolish. Bilk knows this... so he keeps
saying he will not respond to me... only to do so over and over and over
with attacks but without ever actually backing up his outrageous fairy
stories.



-- 
"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children."
-- Richard Stallman

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 13:54 -0500
  Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:09 -0700
    Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 12:26 -0700
      Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:53 -0700
      Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 13:03 -0700
        Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 14:26 -0700
          Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-07 17:48 -0400
            Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:56 -0700
              Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 15:02 -0700
          Bilk makes it clear not even he believes his claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:50 -0700
      Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 17:33 -0500
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-08 00:48 +0200
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:25 -0700
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 19:13 -0700
              Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:38 -0700
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-07 22:34 -0400
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:47 -0700
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:24 -0700
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-08 13:08 -0400
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-08 13:37 -0700
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 15:28 -0700

csiph-web