Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172379

Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims!

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/7/13 2:56 PM, in article CD873987.18ABB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com,
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> So Bilk is left with a few options:
> 
> 1) Acknowledge he cannot understand the facts he has been shown about
>    the collapse of the towers.
> 2) Change his story to drop his claims about compressed air as the
>    primary force that was ejecting materials.
> 3) Go on the attack and accuse me of all sorts of things with the
>    goal to obfuscate his own ignorance and absurd claims.
> 
> Bilk went with #3.

To be fair: with #2 Bilk did not say it was compressed air causing the
forces - he claimed that is what *others* said, and then explained that
compressed air alone would not lead to enough forces (which is correct). He
then jumped to the complete irrational claim that it had to be explosives -
ignoring the fact that there was a *lot* more than just air in those
buildings, such as steel and concrete. Those things are completely ignored
by Bilk's claims.

But, still, the #2 point is worded poorly and makes it seem like Bilk was
blaming compressed air and not the "explosives" he insists were there
contrary to all evidence, logic, common sense, etc.

Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
"I mischaracterize things you say." - Brad cc Wiggins 

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 13:54 -0500
  Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:09 -0700
    Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 12:26 -0700
      Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 12:53 -0700
      Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 13:03 -0700
        Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 14:26 -0700
          Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-07 17:48 -0400
            Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:56 -0700
              Re: Bilk accuses Snit of lying because Snit references Bilk's own claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 15:02 -0700
          Bilk makes it clear not even he believes his claims! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 14:50 -0700
      Re: The Truth About 9/11 Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-04-07 17:33 -0500
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-08 00:48 +0200
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:25 -0700
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-07 19:13 -0700
              Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:38 -0700
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-07 22:34 -0400
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 19:47 -0700
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 18:24 -0700
        Re: The Truth About 9/11 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-08 13:08 -0400
          Re: The Truth About 9/11 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-08 13:37 -0700
            Re: The Truth About 9/11 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 15:28 -0700

csiph-web