Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661446

Re: S paceTime

From Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: S paceTime
Date 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600
Organization Modern Human
Message-ID <vpgcii$knva$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (22 earlier) <67B17B21.3ABB@ix.netcom.com> <67B28FA4.32D4@ix.netcom.com> <voub72$br6o$1@solani.org> <voubgp$br6o$2@solani.org> <vpfokf$kgfl$1@solani.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/23/25 12:15 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 2/16/25 9:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 2/16/25 9:42 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> My guess is that the information of its disappearance will travel 
>>> towards Earth at, or below, the light's speed (i.e. max speed for any 
>>> physical quantity) and when it reaches Earth, the path of Earth 
>>> motion becomes almost linear from that moment on.
>>
>>
>> Actually it can crush the Earth into pieces because parts of the Earth 
>> closer to the absent Sun's position will begin moving linearly while 
>> the rest of the Earth still continues on the usual orbit. So a 
>> crushing of Earth into itself will take place for a couple of seconds 
>> or so.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Huh.. no not a couple of seconds. Just over 40 milliseconds. In the back 
> of my mind I had the sound in the telephone calls to Iran in the old 
> days in my mind. You'd sometimes hear your echo coming back in about a 
> couple of seconds.
> 
> But 40 milliseconds of a huge spherical surface of the change in gravity 
> passing through the Earth could itself be quite significant. One can sit 
> and do a back of the envelope calculation of some of the consequences, 
> looking at, say, only the time at which half of Earth is on orbit around 
> the sun and the other half is moving linearly. I'll leave it to those 
> interested to do that.
> 
> Then after a very rough estimate, do a better analysis as a physicist 
> can, still within the "back of the envelope" scope of the work of 
> course, but showing the time dependent propagation of the result over 
> the entire mass of the earth throughout that 40 milliseconds. This last 
> one, although still a baby problem, is not for the "engineers". 
> "Engineers" like the dead "Jim Pennino" could only finger themselves 
> about it.
> 
> 
> 


Ok, .. another 10 minutes of rest here will give my dick a chance to do 
the back of the envelope calculation.

My dick says, in 40 milliseconds Earth moves on the orbit 30 meters. Its 
distance to the position of Earth had it moved linearly is about 6 
nanometers, which is about 20 silicon atoms inside stone, the way 
silicon is distributed in it (surrounded by oxygens). I'm looking only 
at the crust.

So _EVERY_ silicon atom of the crust in Earth will penetrate through 20 
other silicon atoms, not at once, but in turns, as a wave traveling for 
40 milliseconds across the whole crust.

This is the case for Sun suddenly disappearing. Do the back of the 
envelope calculations for the case of Sun losing, say 20 Earth masses in 
one huge burst in a large storm. Assume the 20 Earth mass disappears 
instantly, and find out what kind of crashes appears in the crust on 
Earth as a result.



Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 18:10 -0800
  Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
    Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 07:25 +0100
    Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-09 23:30 -0800
      Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 01:48 -0800
        Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:57 -0800
          Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
            Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:58 -0800
              Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-13 21:17 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 00:05 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-14 16:13 +0000
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-14 11:35 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:12 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 11:59 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 12:11 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 21:44 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-16 09:13 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:01 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 14:54 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-17 07:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:42 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:47 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:13 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-19 07:55 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600

csiph-web