Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660986

Re: S paceTime

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: S paceTime
Date 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67A1AAC0.624F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <67A12A10.2A78@ix.netcom.com> <1820d0d57014da41$10681$1417112$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <67A13FC6.25E2@ix.netcom.com> <1820d33f2e981c00$15766$1407297$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <67A17706.484A@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >
> > W dniu 03.02.2025 o 23:14, The Starmaker pisze:
> > > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>
> > >> W dniu 03.02.2025 o 21:41, The Starmaker pisze:
> > >>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
> > >>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
> > >>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
> > >>>>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> It's just a madeup thing.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
> > >>>>>>>>>> pretend their shit is math, to improve
> > >>>>>>>>>> its authority.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> , and math is not science.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> It is.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> There are.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Do cats walk a straight line?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On a short distance, sometimes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
> > >>>>>>>>> maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> A photo - why not.
> > >>>>>>>> https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
> > >>>>>>>> the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
> > >>>>>>> straight lines.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
> > >>>>>>> Earth if you prefer.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
> > >>>> Nothing is perfect in the real world.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in
> > >>> space, or
> > >>> on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
> > >>
> > >> Sure.
> > >> https://www.nationalgeographic.com/books/article/7-us-national-parks-with-incredible-trees
> > >> My mistake, it should be that link instead repeating the ruler,
> > >> sorry.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You're looking at the forrest, not the Red Wood trees itself
> > >
> > > In a perspective, everything comes to a point, it's just an illusion.
> > >
> > > https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1309780034/photo/detail-of-a-redwood-tree-trunk.jpg?s=1024x1024&w=is&k=20&c=CeIReGghlUOJiAAqu-kbZPG1PVEKXIyM9Zn6McPPTgQ=
> > > https://www.istockphoto.com/search/2/image-film?phrase=redwood+tree+closeup
> > >
> > >
> > > put a man's ruler on it and measure it.
> >
> > Oh, for sure they're not perfect straight lines.
> > Nothing is perfect in the real world.
> 
> This isn't about a perfect or imperfect world...
> 
> it's about Euclidean geometry.
> 
> Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.

and since Euclidean geometry is 'just a theory'...that means SpaceTime
is just a theory.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 18:10 -0800
  Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
    Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 07:25 +0100
    Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-09 23:30 -0800
      Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 01:48 -0800
        Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:57 -0800
          Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
            Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:58 -0800
              Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-13 21:17 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 00:05 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-14 16:13 +0000
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-14 11:35 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:12 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 11:59 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 12:11 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 21:44 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-16 09:13 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:01 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 14:54 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-17 07:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:42 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:47 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:13 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-19 07:55 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600

csiph-web