Type 1 Blocked Chains

From	Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk>
References	<slrnnh1f5f.995.admin@fleegle.mixmin.net>
Subject	Type 1 Blocked Chains
Message-ID	<5b9855b612fc13df39c0a077e7e2a216@remailer.org.uk> (permalink)
Date	2016-04-15 13:01 +0100
Newsgroups	alt.privacy.anon-server

Show all headers | View raw

I took a look at the type 1 keys of one of the old boy
austria and a kew kid on the block brabus.

The brabus key packets are below:
================================

:public key packet:
	version 4, algo 17, created 1452289155, expires 0
	pkey[0]: [1024 bits]
	pkey[1]: [160 bits]
	pkey[2]: [1022 bits]
	pkey[3]: [1023 bits]
	keyid: BDB55A7A25E266C5
:user ID packet: "Brabus Remailer <brabus@remailer.org.uk>"
:signature packet: algo 17, keyid BDB55A7A25E266C5
	version 4, created 1452289155, md5len 0, sigclass 0x10
	digest algo 2, begin of digest 12 9d
	hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2016-01-08)
	hashed subpkt 11 len 3 (pref-sym-algos: 3 7 2)
	hashed subpkt 30 len 1 (features: 01)
	subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID BDB55A7A25E266C5)
	data: [158 bits]
	data: [160 bits]
:public sub key packet:
	version 4, algo 16, created 1452289155, expires 0
	pkey[0]: [1024 bits]
	pkey[1]: [3 bits]
	pkey[2]: [1024 bits]
	keyid: D1E269CB9D978239
:signature packet: algo 17, keyid BDB55A7A25E266C5
	version 4, created 1452289155, md5len 0, sigclass 0x18
	digest algo 2, begin of digest 95 50
	hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2016-01-08)
	subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID BDB55A7A25E266C5)
	data: [160 bits]
	data: [157 bits]

The austria key packets are below
================================

:public key packet:
	version 4, algo 17, created 1335286805, expires 0
	pkey[0]: [1024 bits]
	pkey[1]: [160 bits]
	pkey[2]: [1024 bits]
	pkey[3]: [1024 bits]
	keyid: 66DD8464B052DF06
:user ID packet: ""privacy.at Anonymous Remailer" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>"
:signature packet: algo 17, keyid 66DD8464B052DF06
	version 4, created 1335286805, md5len 0, sigclass 0x10
	digest algo 2, begin of digest ea 4f
	hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2012-04-24)
	hashed subpkt 11 len 2 (pref-sym-algos: 3 2)
	hashed subpkt 30 len 1 (features: 01)
	subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID 66DD8464B052DF06)
	data: [159 bits]
	data: [160 bits]
:public sub key packet:
	version 4, algo 16, created 1335286805, expires 0
	pkey[0]: [1024 bits]
	pkey[1]: [3 bits]
	pkey[2]: [1023 bits]
	keyid: FEE11582B5DDE492
:signature packet: algo 17, keyid 66DD8464B052DF06
	version 4, created 1335286805, md5len 0, sigclass 0x18
	digest algo 2, begin of digest f9 bd
	hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2012-04-24)
	subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID 66DD8464B052DF06)
	data: [157 bits]
	data: [160 bits]

GnuPG cypher suite is as follow
===============================

    CIPHER_ALGO_NONE        =  0,
    CIPHER_ALGO_IDEA        =  1,
    CIPHER_ALGO_3DES        =  2,
    CIPHER_ALGO_CAST5       =  3,
    CIPHER_ALGO_BLOWFISH    =  4, /* 128 bit */
    /* 5 & 6 are reserved */
    CIPHER_ALGO_AES         =  7,
    CIPHER_ALGO_AES192      =  8,
    CIPHER_ALGO_AES256      =  9,
    CIPHER_ALGO_TWOFISH     = 10, /* 256 bit */
    CIPHER_ALGO_CAMELLIA128 = 11,
    CIPHER_ALGO_CAMELLIA192 = 12,
    CIPHER_ALGO_CAMELLIA256 = 13

brabus preffered cipher algos
=============================

(pref-sym-algos: 3 7 2)

austria preffered cipher algos
==============================

pref-sym-algos: 3 2


What version of GnupG does mixmaster 3.0.3c use to
generate its symmetric keys? Because:
GnuPG changed default cipher for --symmetric to AES-128

Do algos 3 2 need to be forced on mixmaster 3.0.3c ?

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-12 08:53 -0400
  Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-13 00:18 +0200
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Brabus <altaylor06@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 03:35 -0700
    Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 12:14 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-13 14:42 +0000
    Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-13 16:54 +0000
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-13 21:35 +0200
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-14 05:50 +0200
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-14 03:06 -0400
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 00:40 +0000
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-15 08:45 +0200
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-15 15:30 +0200
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Brabus <altaylor06@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 23:46 -0700
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2016-04-14 08:37 +0200
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-14 16:41 +0100
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Cornelis Tromp <nobody@holland.remailer.nl> - 2016-04-14 22:54 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-14 07:22 +0100
  Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 13:31 +0000
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 17:14 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 17:54 +0100
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Red John <redjohn@nym.mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 17:58 +0100
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 19:05 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 18:53 +0000
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Cornelis Tromp <nobody@holland.remailer.nl> - 2016-04-13 22:45 +0100
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 22:04 +0000
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-13 18:41 -0400
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-14 08:33 +0200
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-14 11:07 -0400
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-04-14 22:30 +0200
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-13 18:36 -0400
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2016-04-14 02:17 +0200
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-13 23:56 -0400
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains elvis-85503@notatla.org.uk - 2016-04-14 08:55 +0000
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 01:44 +0000
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-14 10:52 +0000
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-14 14:13 -0400
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 10:04 +0000
          Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 13:01 +0100
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 13:22 +0000
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 13:55 +0000
                Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 17:27 +0100
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 18:12 +0000
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-15 20:29 +0000
              Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 16:31 +0100
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-15 13:29 -0400
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 18:54 +0000
            Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-15 11:18 -0400
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-15 11:45 -0400
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains elvis-85503@notatla.org.uk - 2016-04-16 09:06 +0000

csiph-web