Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.mail.misc > #346

Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ???

Show all headers | View raw

Thor Kottelin wrote:
 
> >> Did RFC 2821 exist in 2000 / 2001?
> >
> > RFC 2821
> > wasn't a standard back then, so RFC 821 applied.
> 
> This is still the case. RFC 821 is a standard (part of STD 10,
> together with RFCs 974 and 1869), RFC 2821 is a proposed standard
> and RFC 5321 is a draft standard.

So my Trendnet TV-IP110w IP-camera, which when sending e-mail begins the
SMTP session by sending "ehlo MAPI1.0", is not adhering to accepted or
universal SMTP conventions.  

And as pointless as it is, my 12-year-old Post.Office SMTP server
software is correctly terminating the session with a "501 Invalid domain
syntax" error.

That's what I wanted to know.

Back to comp.mail.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-12 19:53 -0400
  Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Solbu <solbu@solbu.net.ugyldig> - 2012-10-27 03:31 +0200
    Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-27 18:06 +0000
      Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-27 20:14 -0400
        Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-28 14:07 +0100
          Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-28 12:35 -0400
            Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-10-28 20:49 +0000
        Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-29 22:08 +0000
        Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Claus Aßmann <ca+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@mine.informatik.uni-kiel.de> - 2012-11-02 02:04 +0000
          Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-11-02 08:53 -0400
            Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Claus Aßmann <ca+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@mine.informatik.uni-kiel.de> - 2012-11-02 22:19 +0000
              Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? "Thor Kottelin" <thor@anta.net> - 2012-11-03 11:52 +0200
                Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-11-03 09:44 -0400
                Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-11-03 09:56 -0400
                Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) - 2012-11-10 13:07 -0600
                Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Mike Scott <usenet.14@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2012-11-13 09:45 +0000
  Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-10-28 22:17 -0400
  Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@bde-arc.ampr.org> - 2014-01-31 13:06 -0800
    Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2014-02-01 17:45 +0000
      Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ??? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2014-02-02 00:48 -0600
        Windows Live Mail (Was: Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ???) Tristan Miller <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> - 2014-02-03 14:58 +0100
          Re: Windows Live Mail (Was: Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ???) VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2014-02-03 21:32 -0600
            Re: Windows Live Mail (Was: Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0   ???) Tristan Miller <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> - 2014-02-05 17:29 +0100

csiph-web