Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mail Man Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:44:23 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 20 Message-ID: <50951FB7.D87E73F2@Man.com> References: <5078AD79.AADEC93F@Man.com> <508C78EE.EAD2B0E9@Man.com> <5093C266.B4193524@Man.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: j00MYSoEYuGlIbYp6y1sZw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.mail.misc:346 Thor Kottelin wrote: > >> Did RFC 2821 exist in 2000 / 2001? > > > > RFC 2821 > > wasn't a standard back then, so RFC 821 applied. > > This is still the case. RFC 821 is a standard (part of STD 10, > together with RFCs 974 and 1869), RFC 2821 is a proposed standard > and RFC 5321 is a draft standard. So my Trendnet TV-IP110w IP-camera, which when sending e-mail begins the SMTP session by sending "ehlo MAPI1.0", is not adhering to accepted or universal SMTP conventions. And as pointless as it is, my 12-year-old Post.Office SMTP server software is correctly terminating the session with a "501 Invalid domain syntax" error. That's what I wanted to know.