Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #31384

Re: DFS supports Snit's incest

From "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
References (14 earlier) <ismo5i$cpc$2@dont-email.me> <4deef6ad$1@news.x-privat.org> <iso8r4$eu0$8@dont-email.me> <4defaeea@news.x-privat.org> <75a92c24-d3c3-4f46-951a-b4e67614e4f7@g12g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Subject Re: DFS supports Snit's incest
Date 2011-06-08 12:34 -0700
Organization CYTHES
Message-ID <4defcebd@news.x-privat.org> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


cc wrote:
> On Jun 8, 1:18 pm, "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendit...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Snit is a Usenet rapist and a liar.
>>
>
> Interesting. What exactly is a Usenet rapist?

Snit.

> Snit certainly has raped
> my eyes with long, tedious, pointless posts full of misunderstood
> quotes and an uncanny ability to completely dodge questions,

Great quote!

> but that
> doesn't really seem worthy of a "Usenet rapist" title. Is he raping
> Usenet itself, or individual posters? Should I carry a rape whistle to
> avoid being Usenet raped by Snit?
>
> Also, like DFS (allegedly), I fully support Snit's incest.

You are also one of Snit's shills.

-- 
Lord Seaendithas 

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-03 12:39 -0400
  Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 12:43 -0400
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-03 15:12 -0400
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 15:32 -0400
  Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-03 10:46 -0700
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-03 15:12 -0400
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 15:36 -0400
        Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-03 22:37 +0200
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-03 22:18 +0200
        Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 16:22 -0400
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 08:27 -0700
        Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 17:28 +0200
          Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-04 08:47 -0700
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-04 15:08 -0400
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-04 13:28 -0700
                OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 21:17 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-05 15:23 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-05 13:14 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-05 17:23 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-05 21:42 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-05 20:03 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-05 20:47 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 09:50 +0200
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 06:55 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-06 10:44 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-06 08:59 -0500
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "Magnus" <mag@invalid.com> - 2011-06-06 10:01 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 07:05 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 12:21 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 12:41 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 01:23 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 09:49 +0200
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 06:52 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 04:22 +0000
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 22:15 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:34 +0000
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 06:46 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:12 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:02 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 10:00 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 17:24 +0000
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 11:04 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:30 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:30 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 16:59 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:22 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-06 10:44 -0400
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 06:58 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 16:07 +0200
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 07:18 -0700
                Re: OT: This one's for DFS... TOPIC: Challenging Snit's claim that no one ever provides proof of his lies / wrongdoings Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 11:51 -0700
                DFS:  Still *begging* for attention Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-10 06:17 -0400
                Re: DFS:  Still *begging* for attention flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:26 -0400
          Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 09:11 -0700
          Hadron goes down... again. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 09:44 -0700
          Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 07:51 -0700
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:00 -0700
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 17:03 +0200
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 08:09 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:33 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 08:17 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:35 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 10:34 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 12:36 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 15:34 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 12:43 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 13:04 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 13:39 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:16 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 14:44 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:53 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:12 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 03:46 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 07:28 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 07:54 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:11 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:46 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:03 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:03 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:06 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 07:57 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 08:01 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 08:22 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 17:25 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 08:28 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:57 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 09:32 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 09:52 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:35 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:33 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 19:41 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-06 21:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 18:51 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:00 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-07 10:54 -0600
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 09:56 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-09 04:46 +0000
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 23:21 -0700
                OT: Reputation ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:08 -0700
                Re: OT: Reputation ... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 03:19 +0000
                Re: OT: Reputation ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 22:17 -0700
                Buh bye Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-10 06:12 -0400
                Re: Buh bye High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:37 +0000
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 04:01 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 07:50 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 07:57 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:11 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:11 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 18:50 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:08 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:10 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:20 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 13:07 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 13:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 19:29 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 10:30 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 18:53 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 16:09 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-09 17:20 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 16:12 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-09 22:16 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 19:49 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:07 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 06:31 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:54 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 10:41 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 08:37 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 19:22 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 10:28 -0700
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 15:36 -0400
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 12:42 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 13:08 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 13:24 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 13:46 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:40 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 12:26 -0400
                OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:41 -0700
                Re: Has Snit's claim been refuted? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:49 -0700
                Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 17:08 -0400
                Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 14:54 -0700
                Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:54 -0700
                OT: (troll related content) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:53 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:46 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:49 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:37 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:00 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:07 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 17:59 -0400
                OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:26 -0700
                Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:31 -0700
                Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:11 -0700
                Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 18:51 -0400
                Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:15 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 16:19 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:12 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 19:04 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 22:52 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 20:12 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 07:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:27 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 07:16 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 08:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-08 08:30 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 06:16 -0700
                Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-08 09:19 -0600
                Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:44 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:15 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:30 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 09:33 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 16:30 -0700
                OT: A Chance for Snit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:47 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:56 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:12 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:43 -0400
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:18 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:50 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 12:34 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 05:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 15:15 +0200
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 07:18 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 17:34 +0200
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:28 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:04 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 10:24 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:40 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:21 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:23 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:49 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:01 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:05 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:03 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:51 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 05:25 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 06:28 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 17:05 +0200
                Re: DFS supports his own UI designs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 11:36 -0400
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 08:38 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:10 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 10:30 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:07 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 10:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 11:44 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:20 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:28 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:32 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:39 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:55 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:59 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:03 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:04 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:04 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:05 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:09 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:12 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:16 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-13 04:37 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 06:40 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 16:15 +0100
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:06 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:02 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:23 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:01 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-13 08:15 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 17:28 +0100
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 14:40 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 16:51 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 16:57 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:33 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:45 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:01 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 06:47 -0700
                OT: More bitchy, whiny Snit crap... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:06 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 21:23 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 22:21 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:36 -0700
                OT: Why does DFS ignore reality? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 20:49 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:08 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 12:00 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 13:07 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 13:18 -0400
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 15:59 +0200
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-04 07:17 -0700
  Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-06 23:29 +0200
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 18:23 -0400
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:35 -0700

csiph-web