Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #31266

Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill

From	"Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.setup, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
References	(8 earlier) <isljgk$au5$2@dont-email.me> <80f187c7-5cbc-496b-ba7e-2b723f2202ab@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <ism709$f6f$4@dont-email.me> <4deea5ab@news.x-privat.org> <isma2a$1c5$2@dont-email.me>
Subject	Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill
Date	2011-06-07 18:15 -0700
Organization	Troll Hunters Inc
Message-ID	<4deecd30@news.x-privat.org> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

DFS wrote:
> On 6/7/2011 6:26 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
> Fix the subject line and I'll respond.

You just did respond.  You know you can't defend Snit so you removed all 
content from your reply.

-- 
Lord Seaendithas

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:40 -0700
  Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 12:26 -0400
    OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:41 -0700
      Re: Has Snit's claim been refuted? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:49 -0700
      Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 17:08 -0400
        Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 14:54 -0700
          Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:54 -0700
        OT: (troll related content) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:53 -0700
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:46 -0700
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:49 -0700
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:14 -0700
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:37 -0700
        Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:00 -0700
          Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:07 -0700
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 17:59 -0400
        OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:26 -0700
          Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:31 -0700
            Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:11 -0700
          Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 18:51 -0400
            Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:15 -0700
        Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 16:19 -0700
          Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:12 -0700
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
          Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 19:04 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 22:52 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 20:12 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 07:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:27 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 07:16 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 08:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-08 08:30 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 06:16 -0700
                Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-08 09:19 -0600
                Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:44 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:15 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:30 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 09:33 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 16:30 -0700
                OT: A Chance for Snit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:47 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:56 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:12 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:43 -0400
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:18 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:50 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 12:34 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 05:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 15:15 +0200
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 07:18 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 17:34 +0200
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:28 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:04 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 10:24 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:40 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:21 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:23 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:49 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:01 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:05 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:03 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:51 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:33 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:45 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:01 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 06:47 -0700
                OT: More bitchy, whiny Snit crap... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:06 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 21:23 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 22:21 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:36 -0700
        OT: Why does DFS ignore reality? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 20:49 -0700

csiph-web