Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #31532

Re: DFS supports Snit's incest

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hadron stated in post 8ahb7z10jl.fsf@news.eternal-september.org on 6/9/11
8:34 AM:

>> Well besides you being completely and totally full of shit on this
>> issue, would you like me to clear my posts, topics I wish to post on,
>> and who I would like to respond to, with you beforehand? Do I just
>> email millionsHaveBeenSpentOnResearch@clueless.com?
> 
> You really did lose the plot on it. You were wrong. 100%. YOu were
> provided links, patiently had things explained to you and you still
> refused to let go of your initial misconceptions. I think primarily as a
> result of your dislike for Snit.

But Carroll says he is my shill. :)

> What part of all the docs and links provided to you could you not
> comprehend other than pretty much all of it?
> 
> Once again : do you really think the HUD, for example, in a modern
> fighter plane isn'tdeveloped through the furthering of science? You DO
> realise its a UI right?
> 
> I'm not going to do a Snit on you on this, but you really are being a
> bit of a crybaby about this issue. Accept you were wrong, read up on it,
> contact Airbus or Nasa and google up their development in UI
> systems. You might learn something.

Heck, he should just stop bringing it up and trolling me on his obvious
mistakes.  Every time he does I can just point to
<http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~saul/481/process_diagram.html> and
<http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=67910> and remind him how far from
reality his claims are.

> Millions, if not billions, are indeed spent on UI research and
> development. Especially, but not limited to, in military research
> establishments : scopes, night visions, remote navigation, remote
> controls, etc etc etc etc. Its not only about, but does include, gui
> widgets on screen. Do you really think, for example, no research has
> gone into touch screen dynamics and interaction? Have you ever looked at
> the steering column for a modern F1 car?
> 
> I dont want to argue with you - but you a are wrong. Totally and
> utterly. With no room for error. Its not even debatable.

Exactly.  Hence the reason why he is no longer a paid shill... I took him
off the payroll.  Your check, by the way, is in the mail - sorry it is a bit
late this month.  :)

-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:14 -0700
  Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:37 -0700
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:00 -0700
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:07 -0700
  Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 17:59 -0400
    OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:26 -0700
      Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:31 -0700
        Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:11 -0700
      Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 18:51 -0400
        Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:15 -0700
    Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 16:19 -0700
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:12 -0700
        Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
      Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
        Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 19:04 -0700
          Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 22:52 -0400
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 20:12 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 07:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:27 +0200
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 07:16 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 08:14 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-08 08:30 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 06:16 -0700
                Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-08 09:19 -0600
                Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:44 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:15 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:30 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 09:33 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:17 -0400
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 16:30 -0700
                OT: A Chance for Snit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:47 -0700
                Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:56 -0700
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:12 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:43 -0400
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:18 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:50 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 12:34 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 05:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 15:15 +0200
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 07:18 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 17:34 +0200
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:28 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:04 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 10:24 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:40 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:21 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:23 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:49 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:01 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:05 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:48 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:03 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:51 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 05:25 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 06:28 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 17:05 +0200
                Re: DFS supports his own UI designs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 11:36 -0400
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 08:38 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:10 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 10:30 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:07 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 10:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 11:44 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:20 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:26 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:28 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:32 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:39 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:55 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:59 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:03 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:04 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:04 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:05 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:09 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:12 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:16 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 14:40 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 16:51 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 16:57 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:33 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:45 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:01 -0700
                Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 06:47 -0700
                OT: More bitchy, whiny Snit crap... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:06 -0700
            Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 21:23 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 22:21 -0700
              Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:36 -0700
    OT: Why does DFS ignore reality? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 20:49 -0700

csiph-web