Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #31373
| From | "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| References | (12 earlier) <ismj9s$l6i$4@dont-email.me> <CA1426D5.9B22A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ismo5i$cpc$2@dont-email.me> <4deef6ad$1@news.x-privat.org> <iso8r4$eu0$8@dont-email.me> |
| Subject | Re: DFS supports Snit's incest |
| Date | 2011-06-08 10:18 -0700 |
| Organization | CYTHES |
| Message-ID | <4defaeea@news.x-privat.org> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
DFS wrote: > On 6/8/2011 12:12 AM, Seaendithas Chorster wrote: >> DFS wrote: >>> On 6/7/2011 10:04 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> DFS stated in post ismj9s$l6i$4@dont-email.me on 6/7/11 6:29 PM: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>> Snit, did you send an email to Steve Carroll's girlfriend/wife? >>>>>> >>>>>> Absolutely not. Never. No contact with her in any way, shape or >>>>>> form. Ever. >>>>> >>>>> And I notice Steve Carroll cannot produce the alleged email. >>>> >>>> Being that it does not exist, that is not a surprise. Steve >>>> started by just out and out blaming me for emailing me then admitting >>>> he >>>> had no proof but claiming it had to be me because nobody else would or >>>> some BS. Again, this was years ago and I do not recall the >>>> details. >>>>> And he can't produce your "disparaging, humiliating" webpages >>>>> (which I would guess were very mild by comparison to the >>>>> viciousness with which they attack you). >>>> >>>> I used to have quotes *by* him posted to a webpage... and, gasp, >>>> referred to him as "Spin and Speak" or something like that. >>> >>> That's exactly what I figured it was like. Then the drama queen >>> Carroll calls it "disparaging and humiliating". >> >> Snit started with the posting of lies on the web. > > uh huh. Sure he did. > > Just like he's a sexual harrasser, rapist, forger of PDFs, emailer to > Steve's wife, etc. Do you have any proof he did not? If he did not then why would so many people accuse him of it? A mass conspiracy or Snit it guilty. Which is more likely? >> Now he cries when others >> post pages about him. > > All of your group, including Snit, whine and cry a LOT in csma. Do > you ever talk about Macs and technology? > > Your little anti-Snit csma cabal is a damn disfunctional group, and > Snit doesn't help by staying at the center. But that's his business. Only a Snit shill would think there was a cabal against him. There are people who speak the truth and then there are people like you and Snit. Does he pay you to be his shill? If not he should. >>>>> And he can't produce the "private" emails between you and ed that >>>>> you violated ed's confidence with by posting them to csma. Did >>>>> you? Why? >>>> >>>> I did post an email from ed - I do not recall the details. I >>>> *believe* he had been trolling me in my email, but I really do not >>>> remember. >>> >>> Well, for some reason *nobody* can produce them. >> >> Prove that nobody can. > > Idiot. Translation: no. I have seen these emails and completely understand why Steve would not make them public. They are worse than anything you have found from Elizabot. >>>>> And he can't produce the proof of you "sexually harrassing a woman >>>>> online". >>>> >>>> Of course not - his ex (or not, whatever, I *do not* care) used to >>>> obsess over me, far more than even he did. She: >>>> >>>> * posted information about me obtained from the college website >>>> where I work, including what type of classes I teach and the days I >>>> work. >>> >>> I guess you learned not to put your info out there and let it get >>> associated with your Usenet nym if you're going to argue with >>> idiots. >> >> Snit likes to brag about where he works. > > No he does not, that I've seen. Ever. http://prescottcomputerguy.com/experience.html He loves to brag about where he works now and has in the past. Or claims to assuming he is not impersating the real Michael Glasser as is becoming increasingly clear. Do you know of any college professor who would act the way he does? >>>> * found out my wife and I were expecting a child she repeatedly >>>> whined that I would not discuss family planning options with *her*! >>>> >>>> * Accused me of raping her (we were never within 100 miles of each >>>> other as far as I know... not even in the same state). >>> >>> No, she did not accuse you of rape (at least according to your PDF >>> link below). She said you "raped" (in quotes) the newsgroup, and >>> asked if you found rape funny. >>> >>> When you lie like that, you give them more ammo for attack. >> >> Even you, a Snit shill, know Snit is a liar. > > > I shill myself, fool. And occasionally MS Office. And for Snit. > Yes, Snit lied that she accused him of rape (based only on that PDF), > but it's actually the buffoonish Carroll that directly labeled him a > rapist. Snit is a Usenet rapist and a liar. > Steve Carroll: "Snit is the biggest liar in Usenet history. He > sexually harasses women and is a rapist." > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.macromedia.dreamweaver/msg/dda2940c4a5f470d?hl=en > > > And Elizabot was nasty as all get-out, so she probably did call him a > rapist at some point. You defend Snit's sexual harrasment as you villify Elizabot for defending herself. You do not even try to hide the fact you are a paid Snit shill. <snip irrelevant bullshit> > The more I read the csma bullshit (and I won't be reading it much > longer), the more I see it's you freaks that are way out of control, > and Snit for the most part just calmly sticks to the topic. I knew > it would be like this because I've seen him in action on cola. > > My instincts to support Snit were 100% right. Translation: he pays you enough to shill for him. >>> Saying she accused you of rape is no better than Carroll accusing >>> you of online sex harrassment. >> >> Snit did sexually harrass Steve and Elizabot when he emailed Steve's >> wife with lies about the two of them. > > If he did email Steve's wife, why can nobody prove it? Only a Snit shill would say Steve has to post such filthy lies about his wife. >>>> * Made public threats to contact the police and make false >>>> accusations against me. >>>> >>>> * Tracked me down to where I work and threatened to send her >>>> accusations to my employer >>>> >>>> And much more. Here, a fully documented PDF with quotes and links, >>>> etc. >>>> <http://www.2shared.com/document/NAcquOWe/EBot_Obsession_with_links.html?> Dead link. Why is that? >>>> The fact I documented this and shared it with the police lead to >>>> her no longer posting (at the request of the police). Steve freaked >>>> out and could not handle that I had taken things outside of >>>> Usenet... as though I was doing anything other than protecting >>>> myself and my family. >>> >>> Well, I think you took it too far, but if it made you feel better >>> that's your business. >> >> Snit is the one who insists it is not right to take things out of >> Usenet, but he is the one who posted the web pages and called the >> police. > > He was paranoid and you nutjobs got to him. Proud of yourselves? Snit admits to being mentally ill and for a long time I gave him a pass because of that but it has gone too far and his mental illness is no longer an excuse. He reaps what he sows. > I'm surprised the police Snit contacted even listened to that pile of > Usenet crap, though. I guess they're obligated to take every "threat" > seriously. Who said they did? Snit? And you beleive him? Elizabot stopped posting because of the harrasment, not because of the police. Snit chased her off like he chases off other women and blacks. Snit even calls blacks monkeys. >>>>> And he can't produce proof of the "forged PDFs" >>>> >>>> None exist. Well, not from me anyway. :) >>>> >>>>> And he can't produce proof of you "representing your employer on >>>>> Usenet". >>>> >>>> Nope: and his ex- admitted she is the one who tracked me down: >>>> >>>> <http://goo.gl/vBIJ2> >>>> ----- >>>> But no one here knows your place of employment! I figured >>>> it out... >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> So Steve's girlfriend or whatever tracks me down by digging through >>>> my website and finding a list of bookmarks I had uploaded, then he >>>> insists I am impersonating the person the two of them insist I am. >>>> I did not, at the time, have a business website where I reference >>>> the college. Steve is simply lying when he says he found out where >>>> I work based on my making it public in Usenet (or even a website). >>>> >>>>> Basically, he can't produce 2/3 of the "evidence" of his claims >>>>> against you. Based on your behavior on cola, I choose to believe >>>>> you. Carroll will have to do a LOT better than he's done so far >>>>> to change my mind. >>>> >>>> Well, I just decided I am sick of his BS and gave you a bit more of >>>> the history. I generally do not given that the woman in question >>>> has not bothered me in quite some time - but there you go, the >>>> genesis of all of this. Steve got jealous of when she obsessed >>>> over me to the point the police had to intervene. All documented and >>>> proved, above... >>> >>> >>> She's even sicker than Carroll (if it really is a she). >> >> Everyone already knew where Snit worked. > > So what? You sick fucks have no business threatening to contact his > employer over Usenet arguments. Do you think Yavapai College should know they have a likely impostor claiming to work for them? >>> This bit about implying incest with your daughter crosses the line >>> big time: >>> Elizabot: "Here's a recent photo of a him with his daughter. You >>> don't see any clothes on either one of them - just lots of bare >>> skin. (Remember Snit has a tracking device on the picture, so keep >>> that in mind if you choose to click the link.) >>> >>> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/ash/21b/4.html" >> >> If you saw him like that with your daughter would be OK with it? > > That's his own daughter. What does anyone else's daughter have to do > with it? So why bring it up, unless it's another of your lame, sicko > smear tactics. Snit talks about how there is no logical reason to disallow incest and then shows off almost pornographic images like that and you have no problem with it. >>> Note: a couple more posts and I'm done forever with this "csma >>> circus". >> >> Of course. You can not defend Snit now that even you have noted how >> much of a liar he is. > > > He's not much of a liar at all. I see constant, moronic, blithering > liars every day in cola, and Snit is no match for them. You already admitted he lied. You are right though that Snit is no match for reality. -- Lord Seaendithas
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-03 12:39 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 12:43 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-03 15:12 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 15:32 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-03 10:46 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-03 15:12 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 15:36 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-03 22:37 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-03 22:18 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-03 16:22 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 08:27 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 17:28 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-04 08:47 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-04 15:08 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-04 13:28 -0700
OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 21:17 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-05 15:23 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-05 13:14 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-05 20:03 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 09:50 +0200
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 06:55 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-06 10:44 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-06 08:59 -0500
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "Magnus" <mag@invalid.com> - 2011-06-06 10:01 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 07:05 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 12:21 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 12:41 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 01:23 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 09:49 +0200
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 06:52 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 04:22 +0000
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 22:15 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:34 +0000
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 06:46 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:12 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:02 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 10:00 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 17:24 +0000
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 11:04 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:30 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:30 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 16:59 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:22 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-06 10:44 -0400
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 06:58 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 16:07 +0200
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 07:18 -0700
Re: OT: This one's for DFS... TOPIC: Challenging Snit's claim that no one ever provides proof of his lies / wrongdoings Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 11:51 -0700
DFS: Still *begging* for attention Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-10 06:17 -0400
Re: DFS: Still *begging* for attention flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:26 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 09:11 -0700
Hadron goes down... again. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 09:44 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 07:51 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:00 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 17:03 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 08:09 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 08:17 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 08:35 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 10:34 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 12:36 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 15:34 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 12:43 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 13:04 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 13:39 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:16 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 14:44 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:53 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:12 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 03:46 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 07:28 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 07:54 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:11 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:46 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:03 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 14:03 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:06 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 07:57 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 08:01 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 08:22 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 17:25 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 08:28 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:57 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 09:32 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 09:52 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:35 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:33 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 19:41 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-06 21:17 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 18:51 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:00 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-07 10:54 -0600
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 09:56 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-09 04:46 +0000
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 23:21 -0700
OT: Reputation ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:08 -0700
Re: OT: Reputation ... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 03:19 +0000
Re: OT: Reputation ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 22:17 -0700
Buh bye Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-10 06:12 -0400
Re: Buh bye High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:37 +0000
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 04:01 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 07:50 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 07:57 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:11 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:11 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 18:50 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:08 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:10 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 08:20 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 13:07 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 13:17 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 19:29 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 10:30 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 18:53 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 16:09 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-09 17:20 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 16:12 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-09 22:16 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 19:49 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:07 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 06:31 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:54 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 10:41 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 08:37 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 19:22 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 10:28 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 15:36 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 12:42 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 13:08 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-06 13:24 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 13:46 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:40 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 12:26 -0400
OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:41 -0700
Re: Has Snit's claim been refuted? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:49 -0700
Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 17:08 -0400
Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 14:54 -0700
Re: OT: Has Snit's claim been refuted? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:54 -0700
OT: (troll related content) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:53 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:46 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:49 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:37 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:00 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:07 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 17:59 -0400
OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:26 -0700
Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 15:31 -0700
Re: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:11 -0700
Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 18:51 -0400
Re: OT: DFS admits to being a Snit shill "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:15 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 18:12 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 21:29 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 19:04 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 22:52 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 20:12 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 07:17 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:27 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 07:16 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-08 08:30 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 06:16 -0700
Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-08 09:19 -0600
Re: Snit an "effete candy-ass" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:44 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:15 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:30 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 09:33 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2011-06-08 19:17 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-08 16:30 -0700
OT: A Chance for Snit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:47 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:56 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 21:12 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-08 12:43 -0400
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:18 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 10:50 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 12:34 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 05:48 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 15:15 +0200
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 07:18 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:26 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 17:34 +0200
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:48 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:28 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:04 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 10:24 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 10:40 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:21 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:23 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:49 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:01 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:05 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:26 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 11:48 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 12:03 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 13:51 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 05:25 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 06:28 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 17:05 +0200
Re: DFS supports his own UI designs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 11:36 -0400
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 08:38 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:10 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 10:30 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:07 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 10:26 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 11:44 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:20 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:26 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:28 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:32 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 12:39 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:55 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 12:59 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:03 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:04 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:04 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:05 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:09 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:12 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 13:16 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-13 04:37 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 06:40 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 16:15 +0100
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:06 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:02 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:23 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:01 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-13 08:15 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 17:28 +0100
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 14:40 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 16:51 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest "High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 16:57 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 08:33 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 08:45 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 09:01 -0700
Re: DFS supports Snit's incest Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-09 06:47 -0700
OT: More bitchy, whiny Snit crap... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 13:06 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-07 21:23 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Seaendithas Chorster" <Seaendithas@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:36 -0700
OT: Why does DFS ignore reality? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 20:49 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:08 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 12:00 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-07 13:07 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-07 13:18 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 15:59 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-04 07:17 -0700
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-06 23:29 +0200
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-06 18:23 -0400
Re: Linosuck labels Snit an "effete candy-ass"? "Steve Carroll" <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 19:35 -0700
csiph-web