Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #82965
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.freeware, alt.hacker, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw |
| Date | 2015-10-11 02:19 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20151011021930.15ee19c8@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <101020152007293273%nospam@nospam.invalid> <20151011020959.5f613459@maxa-pc> <101020152013154053%nospam@nospam.invalid> <20151011021517.0cc303d6@maxa-pc> <101020152016124620%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:16:12 -0400 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <20151011021517.0cc303d6@maxa-pc>, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> > wrote: > > > > > > classic mac os does not care if the disk is full. it can > > > > > easily run with 0k free. > > > > > > > > It depends on application. Error is there, therefore > > > > application can act accordingly... > > > > > > no it doesn't. an app in classic mac os can't write a file to a > > > full hard drive no matter how hard it tries and the system will > > > not crash. > > > > Same on ext file systems... small amount is always reserved so > > systems don;t crash,,, > > what part of full is not clear? 0k free. no reserve. full. Nonsense. How can you prevent an app not to fill up disk on Mac OS if not reserving space? You get error only on disk full and disk is not full until last byte is written... you know... so if your Mac OS app writes size bytes it can fill up disk without even getting disk full error, you got it now?
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-08 22:49 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 01:51 -0400
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 13:54 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:14 -0400
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 20:18 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-09 21:36 -0700
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 14:22 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 16:16 -0700
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:12 -0600
iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-10 16:30 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:14 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 00:17 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:29 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Anonymous - 2015-10-10 18:38 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 01:54 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:07 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:16 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 12:51 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 11:18 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 18:00 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 12:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:37 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 13:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:12 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 14:16 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:23 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:34 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-11 17:37 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:15 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-12 12:45 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-12 14:58 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 19:09 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 01:59 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:07 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:09 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:13 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:15 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:16 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:19 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:27 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:34 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:36 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:40 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:43 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:48 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 12:42 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 11:18 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 11:58 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 12:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 18:45 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:28 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-11 11:27 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 16:23 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 05:59 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-12 08:59 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 16:22 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 15:55 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 06:02 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-12 12:05 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 12:27 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 22:11 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 00:50 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 01:10 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:21 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 01:24 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:28 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 03:48 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 02:03 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 19:22 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:21 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 05:51 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 11:46 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:18 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-10 19:41 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 02:23 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:21 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 13:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:04 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 14:16 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:32 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-12 12:40 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 15:56 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 01:08 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:22 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 11:50 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:13 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 20:30 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Yrrah <Yrrah-acf@acf.invalid> - 2015-10-11 15:25 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:24 -0500
csiph-web