Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #82971
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.freeware, alt.hacker, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw |
| Date | 2015-10-11 02:48 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20151011024855.5268897a@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | (18 earlier) <101020152027325453%nospam@nospam.invalid> <20151011023438.1184d0e0@maxa-pc> <101020152036036089%nospam@nospam.invalid> <20151011024021.28bb33a4@maxa-pc> <101020152043574556%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:43:57 -0400 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <20151011024021.28bb33a4@maxa-pc>, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> > wrote: > > > > > Same as on Linux... > > > > > > definitely not. > > > > > > fill the drive and it *will* crash. unix *can't* run with 0k free. > > > > Look. In the last 15 years I saw lot of Linux servers and never had > > crash because of disk failure... *never* > > bullshit. You are bullshiting all the time. Only way system can crash is when drive becomes totally inoperable. That is disk is not read only, but cannot be read from. Which is extremely rare as on errors system remounts partition as read-only. Saw that *many* times and system continues to work without problem. No crash. Zilsch, nada...
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-08 22:49 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 01:51 -0400
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 13:54 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:14 -0400
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 20:18 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-09 21:36 -0700
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 14:22 -0600
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 16:16 -0700
Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:12 -0600
iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-10 16:30 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:14 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 00:17 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:29 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Anonymous - 2015-10-10 18:38 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 18:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 01:54 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:07 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:16 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 12:51 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 11:18 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 18:00 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 12:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:37 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 13:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:12 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 14:16 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:23 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:34 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-11 17:37 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:15 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-12 12:45 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-12 14:58 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 19:09 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 01:59 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:07 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:09 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:13 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:15 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:16 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:19 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:27 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:34 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:36 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:40 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 20:43 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 02:48 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-11 12:42 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 11:18 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 11:58 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 12:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 18:45 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:28 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-11 11:27 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 16:23 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 05:59 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw - Snit worthy "challenge" in progress Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-12 08:59 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-10-11 16:22 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 15:55 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 06:02 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-12 12:05 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-12 12:27 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 22:11 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 00:50 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 01:10 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:21 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 01:24 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:28 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-11 03:48 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 02:03 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 19:22 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:21 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-11 05:51 +0000
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 11:46 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:18 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-10 19:41 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-10 21:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 02:23 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:21 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 13:41 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:04 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 14:16 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 13:32 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-12 12:40 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 15:56 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 01:08 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-11 04:02 -0400
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:22 -0500
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-11 11:50 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 21:13 -0600
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 20:30 -0700
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Yrrah <Yrrah-acf@acf.invalid> - 2015-10-11 15:25 +0200
Re: iCultist cites serious OS X flaw Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 12:24 -0500
csiph-web