Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #153750
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? |
| Date | 2026-04-29 09:53 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10sse2c$3oirt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <10sq9po$3578e$1@dont-email.me> <1jo4zbdol08pg$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <10sr1to$3d16r$2@dont-email.me> <5qerit83fays.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
VanguardLH,
>>> When Caller-ID is disabled (for your outbound calls), you are seen
>>> as Anonymous. If a recipient blocks Anonymous callers, you won't
>>> get through.
>>
>> Ding, ding, ding, ding! You win a prize!
>
> So, why call them anonymously in the first place knowing there's a good
> chance they will block you,
Kiddo, in the sentence just below what you quoted there I mentioned that I
wanted to be able to provide caller-id to people /of my choice/.
So yes, I'm rather aware that some people will block anonymous callers.
Interesting enough though, I do not know of any company which will do so.
> They list:
>
> *67 + 10-digit phone number Block Caller ID for a single call
I already mentioned that my country uses #31# for that. Do you really think
that your countries codes will be in any way usefull to me ?
> If you do not have an online account with your telco, I don't see how
> you can access user-configurable options on your account,
Well duh! If you do not have {something} you cannot use {something}. And
water is wet. <whistle>
> like disabling Caller-ID on outbound calls by default.
I think you missed that I already did that, courtesy of my phone / android.
No telco assist needed.
When are you going to try to answer my question ?
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 14:39 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 08:54 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-28 20:22 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:30 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 19:09 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 09:53 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-29 06:14 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 14:54 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-29 19:46 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 21:39 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? David Oseas <doseas{nospam}@usa.net> - 2026-04-28 09:55 -0700
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-04-28 13:21 -0600
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:14 +0200
csiph-web